05-19-2016, 11:28 AM
I know, I meant to keep a differentiation but it spilled over into combining the two view points. I understand the distinction.
And I apologize for misreading the tone in your post, I just wasn't sure what you were getting at. Plus I feel like I had answered all of those questions (really just one question reworded 4 ways) in this thread already. Yes, this is the best way I know how to describe this feeling/exchange of energy, and I've tried other ways, and I'll keep trying new ways. Words are hard, however.
To you, I would ask, how do you see the transformation? What are you "giving up" in terms of which principle use of the mind are you letting go of? Because to me that is the main concept of the archetype. I would also like to mention that the male's eyes are closed, so the matrix doesn't actually have a vision of WHAT he wants to potentiate, but merely would like to blindly follow the 'path' of his choice. To me it makes sense in the context of surrendering your will to the one you love - not because you are unworthy or have to lie or change yourself for the one you love, but because your will becomes their will. This is about aligning your will with the will of the Creator, which is your will anyway - another paradox, but resolvable. And it's about consciously, constantly letting go of any attitude towards others that their resources are yours to use. Do you look for ways which you are viewing others as just resources, and reframing your intentions when you do? Because then you are using the transformation of the mind.
It takes being able to look at oneself honestly, and without judgement. There is always work to be done. It's easy to slip and desire that are needs are met before others'. But when you are in love, the others' needs become your own, and your desires become fulfilling the needs of the others', because that's what brings you joy. I don't know how else to describe it. Yes, in one way there is sacrifice of the self involved, but only in the way that you know that coming together in harmony creates a greater sum than its parts. The only sacrifice is the 3rd density parts of the ego that think our gratification is more important the the very real other-self that is involved in nearly every transaction.
Would it work to take the analogy all the way sexual? Ra says 6th density unity is of the "fusion" nature, being a "constant orgasm of delight". With the left-hand transformation, you are receiving the "orgasm", and the other-self in the interaction is likely not, at least not by any effort of yours. In the right hand transformation, the orgasm of the other-self is paramount and the end-goal of the of the "courting". I suppose how I can see that is muddled by our culture, because the male is usually "courting" for his own gratification. But this is decidedly what we are not talking about. "Courting" for your own gratification is viewing all through the lens of the prostitute, a means of getting your rocks off. Carefully courting a maiden means wanting her gratification above your own, or at the same time, as Ra says the simultaneous orgasm is the most powerful.
For instance, when my husband and I make love, I have multiple orgasms. Due to protracted courtship, we have pretty intense love-making, and when I orgasm, it feels just as good for him. So he focuses on gratifying me into orgasm because when he actually orgasms, the act of "courtship"/copulation is over, so he delays his own gratification because he's actually getting more gratification that way, experiencing more orgasms, because my orgasms are his orgasms, my joy is his joy, my hunger is his hunger, my satiation is his satiation, there is no separation, but complete fusion. This is the reward of a careful and protracted courtship. And this goes both ways. I'm not sitting back as the female and saying "Please me, pleasure me, worship me, male!" - the genders don't matter (except in the literal description of sexual polarity and the ability of females to have multiple orgasms). While lovemaking, I am focused on his gratification, as well - though, ironically, and as polarity has it, again, his gratification is delaying his own for my gratification, so the best thing I can really do in the situation is give in and enjoy myself, because it's the mutual act of enjoyment that feeds-back into itself when you are in love.
And I apologize for misreading the tone in your post, I just wasn't sure what you were getting at. Plus I feel like I had answered all of those questions (really just one question reworded 4 ways) in this thread already. Yes, this is the best way I know how to describe this feeling/exchange of energy, and I've tried other ways, and I'll keep trying new ways. Words are hard, however.
To you, I would ask, how do you see the transformation? What are you "giving up" in terms of which principle use of the mind are you letting go of? Because to me that is the main concept of the archetype. I would also like to mention that the male's eyes are closed, so the matrix doesn't actually have a vision of WHAT he wants to potentiate, but merely would like to blindly follow the 'path' of his choice. To me it makes sense in the context of surrendering your will to the one you love - not because you are unworthy or have to lie or change yourself for the one you love, but because your will becomes their will. This is about aligning your will with the will of the Creator, which is your will anyway - another paradox, but resolvable. And it's about consciously, constantly letting go of any attitude towards others that their resources are yours to use. Do you look for ways which you are viewing others as just resources, and reframing your intentions when you do? Because then you are using the transformation of the mind.
It takes being able to look at oneself honestly, and without judgement. There is always work to be done. It's easy to slip and desire that are needs are met before others'. But when you are in love, the others' needs become your own, and your desires become fulfilling the needs of the others', because that's what brings you joy. I don't know how else to describe it. Yes, in one way there is sacrifice of the self involved, but only in the way that you know that coming together in harmony creates a greater sum than its parts. The only sacrifice is the 3rd density parts of the ego that think our gratification is more important the the very real other-self that is involved in nearly every transaction.
Would it work to take the analogy all the way sexual? Ra says 6th density unity is of the "fusion" nature, being a "constant orgasm of delight". With the left-hand transformation, you are receiving the "orgasm", and the other-self in the interaction is likely not, at least not by any effort of yours. In the right hand transformation, the orgasm of the other-self is paramount and the end-goal of the of the "courting". I suppose how I can see that is muddled by our culture, because the male is usually "courting" for his own gratification. But this is decidedly what we are not talking about. "Courting" for your own gratification is viewing all through the lens of the prostitute, a means of getting your rocks off. Carefully courting a maiden means wanting her gratification above your own, or at the same time, as Ra says the simultaneous orgasm is the most powerful.
For instance, when my husband and I make love, I have multiple orgasms. Due to protracted courtship, we have pretty intense love-making, and when I orgasm, it feels just as good for him. So he focuses on gratifying me into orgasm because when he actually orgasms, the act of "courtship"/copulation is over, so he delays his own gratification because he's actually getting more gratification that way, experiencing more orgasms, because my orgasms are his orgasms, my joy is his joy, my hunger is his hunger, my satiation is his satiation, there is no separation, but complete fusion. This is the reward of a careful and protracted courtship. And this goes both ways. I'm not sitting back as the female and saying "Please me, pleasure me, worship me, male!" - the genders don't matter (except in the literal description of sexual polarity and the ability of females to have multiple orgasms). While lovemaking, I am focused on his gratification, as well - though, ironically, and as polarity has it, again, his gratification is delaying his own for my gratification, so the best thing I can really do in the situation is give in and enjoy myself, because it's the mutual act of enjoyment that feeds-back into itself when you are in love.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)