06-03-2016, 10:31 AM
Quote:I don't see how this goes against anything I said.
I mainly gave examples where you could be called to be loving in a way that would not suit yourself to be loving, and you said yourself you'd rather dismiss your own inner feelings and intuition as negative greetings because they wouldn't reflect the way your mind desires to show being loving, yet would go pointlessly dance in the rain while it serves no one if asked. I gave these examples not to justify myself but to see whether or not what you have been saying holds ground only when it suits your own ways.
Also how much you dismiss any aspect of wisdom and heightened awareness as having anything to do with the transformation of the mind, does show you do not desire to see things more clearly if they imply letting go of the manner you enjoy loving others and as such you do avoid the transformation yourself.
I do not believe this experience is not just about blindly trusting your intuition - the veil is there to confuse our intuition. We use the archetypes to pierce the veil. You were right that at its face my analogy doesn't stand up, because you -shouldn't- just blindly do what the maiden asks - not at first - it is about cultivating a level of discernment. But the discernment is felt through the heart and not through the mind. Activating the green-ray. In my example, I was speaking from the experience of consciously working with courting the maiden and then listening to her impulses. I was also talking about an act for the self, that didn't involve the complex free will implications of involving others in your spontaneous act of joy. It was a poor analogy in context because it didn't actually involve any "resources" of others, except the will of the maiden as a resource. But again, there are "two" maidens, in my example again I was presuming that one would be able to discern that.
You say that you would listen to your maiden if she told you that you should murder someone. That's fine. That's not how to use the transformation of the mind, IMO, but it's how your use your free will and that's totally fine. (We didn't have free will before the veil!) The fact is, we are constantly getting "negative" thoughts/impulses - through the veil. What if Carla did everything her maiden asked of her - she would have been displaced into negative 6th density. Instead, she took the extra moment to move into her heart chakra (Christ energy) every time she went into trance to make sure that the "greeting" was of the proper type.
Dancing in the rain was used as an example because it was an act of spontaneous joy that may then in turn lead to another act of spontaneous joy. Sure, again, I wasn't saying -explicitly- what I meant, so I apologize that one part of my analogy doesn't "hold up" to both transformations. But my point on the archetype is that we all get negative impulses, to say, assault someone out of anger or to run our car off the road, we've discussed these things, they're part of the veiled human experience. This is what I consider a "negative greeting". We don't give in to our bad impulses, most of the time. So the "bad" impulses refine themselves so that they appear more palatable. This is all a constant test, whether we like it or not. It's not pass/fail though because time is an illusion, it's just a series of moments laid upon each other, and each subsequent moment we hope to do "better" than the moment before. We can choose unity, or separation. Yes there is unity in separation, but if you are actively separating with your thoughts/actions, you aren't engaging in unity (yes another paradox). That's the point of the transformation.
The manner I desire to love others is the manner they desire to be loved. If someone asks me for food, that's asking for love and I'll give it to them. If someone asks me to ignore them and let them sleep, I'll try to give them that love, too. If someone wants love that causes them death as a victim, I'm going to let someone else be the bearer of that love, but I will still allow it and allow others to have that type of love. My point is that those who want "that type of love" are moving to a different planet as this one shifts to 4D - which is not solely my decision or doing, I'm just here to help, and I feel that very, very clearly. Change is happening. You may want to be outside of change by not affecting things but that is not truly experiencing all facets of the Creator - the Creator who desires, who changes, who reaches out in love and comfort to all those about it, especially those in this difficult, veiled experience.
You tell me I'm not using the transformation of the mind in the way you see it and you are right. There are two transformations of the mind. Again, it's not just about "changing the mind into any new configuration", it's about using the mind complex to polarize more and more thoroughly. I'm going to always do my best to only use one transformation of the mind, because that is the whole point. So I agree with you that I'm not using the transformation of the mind in the way that you understand it.
I had a thought while driving the other day about this archetype, and where it is in our modern culture. There's actually a ubiquitously (though usually facetiously) used trope that I think is our modern/Christian interpretation - no romance, but more religion.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Ma...elBadAngel