Courting the maiden

[Minyatur]

I don't see how this goes against anything I said.

I mainly gave examples where you could be called to be loving in a way that would not suit yourself to be loving, and you said yourself you'd rather dismiss your own inner feelings and intuition as negative greetings because they wouldn't reflect the way your mind desires to show being loving, yet would go pointlessly dance in the rain while it serves no one if asked. I gave these examples not to justify myself but to see whether or not what you have been saying holds ground only when it suits your own ways.

Also how much you dismiss any aspect of wisdom and heightened awareness as having anything to do with the transformation of the mind, does show you do not desire to see things more clearly if they imply letting go of the manner you enjoy loving others and as such you do avoid the transformation yourself.

I do not believe this experience is not just about blindly trusting your intuition - the veil is there to confuse our intuition. We use the archetypes to pierce the veil. You were right that at its face my analogy doesn't stand up, because you -shouldn't- just blindly do what the maiden asks - not at first - it is about cultivating a level of discernment. But the discernment is felt through the heart and not through the mind. Activating the green-ray. In my example, I was speaking from the experience of consciously working with courting the maiden and then listening to her impulses. I was also talking about an act for the self, that didn't involve the complex free will implications of involving others in your spontaneous act of joy. It was a poor analogy in context because it didn't actually involve any "resources" of others, except the will of the maiden as a resource. But again, there are "two" maidens, in my example again I was presuming that one would be able to discern that.

My example was built upon using your heart and not your mind. I said a few times that I put my intuition into words if I care to but that it is mainly just feelings. When put into words you process within your mind why the feelings are as they are.

I agree about discernement although discernement comes from experience which is part of the fool's journey through the many paths. We each have a unique veil that requires our paths to be walked differently and we each will open to a unique blending of our essence to which we can find alignment with.

You say that you would listen to your maiden if she told you that you should murder someone. That's fine. That's not how to use the transformation of the mind, IMO, but it's how your use your free will and that's totally fine. (We didn't have free will before the veil!) The fact is, we are constantly getting "negative" thoughts/impulses - through the veil. What if Carla did everything her maiden asked of her - she would have been displaced into negative 6th density. Instead, she took the extra moment to move into her heart chakra (Christ energy) every time she went into trance to make sure that the "greeting" was of the proper type.

Well I know my maiden would not ask this of me for obvious reasons, probably an inability to feel love while doing the deed.

In regards to Calrla, I would believe being displaced into a negative density could have allowed her to learn to find a greater love within herself, greater understanding of other-selves that are there to be love. Still this is an experience little would willingly and consciously go with, although I believe there are some that do move from the Light to the Dark without being veiled for the sake of better understanding both others and themselves.

Still just is ultimately resistance to know yourself as it takes time to distill and find the underlying love. Darkness is dark when it is not understood as Light.

Dancing in the rain was used as an example because it was an act of spontaneous joy that may then in turn lead to another act of spontaneous joy. Sure, again, I wasn't saying -explicitly- what I meant, so I apologize that one part of my analogy doesn't "hold up" to both transformations. But my point on the archetype is that we all get negative impulses, to say, assault someone out of anger or to run our car off the road, we've discussed these things, they're part of the veiled human experience. This is what I consider a "negative greeting". We don't give in to our bad impulses, most of the time. So the "bad" impulses refine themselves so that they appear more palatable. This is all a constant test, whether we like it or not. It's not pass/fail though because time is an illusion, it's just a series of moments laid upon each other, and each subsequent moment we hope to do "better" than the moment before. We can choose unity, or separation. Yes there is unity in separation, but if you are actively separating with your thoughts/actions, you aren't engaging in unity (yes another paradox). That's the point of the transformation.

I think my example was mainly about a form of martyr and you said you wouldn't want to martyr yourself in this way, which is fine.

My example was still about you feeling called to do this through a feeling of love, else yeah my example makes no sense within the context.

The manner I desire to love others is the manner they desire to be loved. If someone asks me for food, that's asking for love and I'll give it to them. If someone asks me to ignore them and let them sleep, I'll try to give them that love, too. If someone wants love that causes them death as a victim, I'm going to let someone else be the bearer of that love, but I will still allow it and allow others to have that type of love. My point is that those who want "that type of love" are moving to a different planet as this one shifts to 4D - which is not solely my decision or doing, I'm just here to help, and I feel that very, very clearly. Change is happening. You may want to be outside of change by not affecting things but that is not truly experiencing all facets of the Creator - the Creator who desires, who changes, who reaches out in love and comfort to all those about it, especially those in this difficult, veiled experience.

Like I said in another thread yesterday, I'd love to see this earth being allowed to further it's experiences within more 3D cycles without legions of light being, that were not even incarnating here before the harvest period, come and lock this planet forcefully into their desired outcome, removing most of humanity from it's social and racial minds that had an on-going evolution and also it's own choice. Even though it is done through radiating light, I see control driven by these legions' inhability to distill this place as worthwhile in their eyes.

I believe I incarnated both with positive and negative settings for myself depending of what I thought was useful and in an attempt to allow humanity to make it's own choices. I played many roles where I have both allowed myself to not be loving (which does a lot of hurting self) and also overly loving into martyring myself for others. I think I am part of a group that has been at work for a long time in this world and I don't adhere to this forceful STO harvest ideology and see a lack of love or rather understanding for this place.

Might just be projecting that on you though.

You tell me I'm not using the transformation of the mind in the way you see it and you are right. There are two transformations of the mind. Again, it's not just about "changing the mind into any new configuration", it's about using the mind complex to polarize more and more thoroughly. I'm going to always do my best to only use one transformation of the mind, because that is the whole point. So I agree with you that I'm not using the transformation of the mind in the way that you understand it.

Well in my case the archetype is a tool for alignment and the two choices are mainly for a 3D transition into 4D. I seek alignment with my unconscious more than any path and am well aware I am already able to go into 4D and beyond in both polarized densities if I so desire without needing to do it from 3D.

The archetype as a tool still is there, I make a different use of it than what Ra suggests.