10-06-2010, 06:50 PM
I've not read the full thread, due to time, so please excuse myself (or yourself, rather) if my reply is a repetition of previous remarks.
Firstly, suffering is an inherent aspect of the combination of free will and the veil. The creator, upon knowing itself by penetrating the veil, was considered the 'most fun' choice by the
Logos. Without it, catalyst was minimal.
Secondly, with my best efforts as to not derail the thread, the one infinite creator implies, by name and nature, to experience all that can be experienced. An existence of unbound inclusion, rather than selective inclusion.
An excellent question. In my humble opinion, it can be viewed from the perspective of the fractal nature of the creation. And when doing so, one would consider the notion that the Logos experiences that which is a sub-set of itself, just as the OIC experiences itself as each Logos.
More importantly, as we evolve through the densities, jumping up the sub-sub ladder, as so to speak, we become closer to the Original Thought. This OT experiences all, and hence, this would be the nature and will of the Logos, as it seeks to discover more of itself as the OT/OIC.
Namasté
Firstly, suffering is an inherent aspect of the combination of free will and the veil. The creator, upon knowing itself by penetrating the veil, was considered the 'most fun' choice by the
Logos. Without it, catalyst was minimal.
Secondly, with my best efforts as to not derail the thread, the one infinite creator implies, by name and nature, to experience all that can be experienced. An existence of unbound inclusion, rather than selective inclusion.
Quantum Wrote:It begs the first question.: Does the Creator Logos suffer as a consequence of ITs suffering through us? Might It weep for us as much as IT would have us choose another way for ITself, but will not will it for having given ITself free will to choose otherwise? Or is the Logos unfeeling and neutral?
An excellent question. In my humble opinion, it can be viewed from the perspective of the fractal nature of the creation. And when doing so, one would consider the notion that the Logos experiences that which is a sub-set of itself, just as the OIC experiences itself as each Logos.
More importantly, as we evolve through the densities, jumping up the sub-sub ladder, as so to speak, we become closer to the Original Thought. This OT experiences all, and hence, this would be the nature and will of the Logos, as it seeks to discover more of itself as the OT/OIC.
Namasté