YinYa Wrote:Minya Wrote:I think I interpret this quote differently, this to me means the nexus point into which the planet can shift is fixed, but does not imply that the cycle cannot repeat as there should be no default outcome, and so that the clock would simply strike the hour again when the cycle completes again.
It's a little difficult to try and untangle what you said here, but I feel this is another example where you complicate things which are not complicated, as I mentioned earlier in this thread. There isn't another way to interpret what Ra has said, the cycle length is fixed, when the cycle ends, this planet will be 4D, and those not graduating to 4D will repeat 3D elsewhere. You also didn't say it's your own personal interpretation, you said "the channelings make it clear", which simply isn't so. That's why it's frustrating to follow this thread, because you state things which isn't so. Ra didn't say it's a nexus point where the planet can shift, they said it's a nexus point where the planet will shift. There is not another 75 000 year 3rd density cycle on this planet, there is only one.
I don't think Ra's quote goes against what I said. They say it will shift for the same reason some positive channelings seem overly happy to state that the harvest is set to happen as things are going. This does not mean that it could not skip the nexus point and need to repeat the cycle.
My point about polarity is that there is a choice mankind has to make about direction this planet will shift toward and that this choice is infringed upon by positive wanderers that through incarnating forcefully highten the planet's vibration toward the positive. So while there is purpose to this, it doesn't change the fact that they strip mankind of making it's own choice.
YinYa Wrote:Minya Wrote:Else it'd be like the major cycle's purpose is to offer time to make the choice to polarize toward the negative, if not it goes with the default choice of positive. I think a shift toward the upper cycle to hapoen requires a strong enough leaning one way or another at the time the clock strikes the hour so that the planet locks into a higher vibration. Ra didn't say it's a nexus point
I'm sorry, this statement is almost as confusing and ambiguous as the one above I attempted to respond to. It makes no sense whatsoever. You state many things as fact which isn't what Ra said, like saying earlier that the purpose for 3D is self awareness, it isn't, 3D is the density of choice. Self awareness is a requirement for 2D harvest to 3D.
Choice is something that comes from the exploration of self-awareness, so while it is the requirement to move from 2D to 3D, it is still the focus of 3D.
Quote:Ra: I am Ra. The path of our learning is graven in the present moment. There is no history, as we understand your concept. Picture, if you will, a circle of being. We know the alpha and omega as infinite intelligence. The circle never ceases. It is present. The densities we have traversed at various points in the circle correspond to the characteristics of cycles: first, the cycle of awareness; second, the cycle of growth; third, the cycle of self-awareness; fourth, the cycle of love or understanding; fifth, the cycle of light or wisdom; sixth, the cycle of light/love, love/light, or unity; seventh, the gateway cycle; eighth, the octave which moves into a mystery we do not plumb.
Took me a few seconds to find a quote where Ra called the third cycle the one of self-awareness. So seems that in your own example of saying I say things Ra did not say, you did so yourself and said something unlike Ra's teachings to negate something I said which was in accordance.
YinYa Wrote:I didn't read through your entire post, but it becomes a bit of a pointless discussion when you change things Ra said, or state things as factual which isn't so, when this forum is dedicated to the teachings of Ra...
I extrapoliate from things more than change anything.