Minya Wrote:I don't think Ra's quote goes against what I said. They say it will shift for the same reason some positive channelings seem overly happy to state that the harvest is set to happen as things are going. This does not mean that it could not skip the nexus point and need to repeat the cycle.
Let's back up a little, you said:
Minya Wrote:I think the channelings make it clear that if there was no wanderer incarnating, then the Gaia would not shift into 4D and the harvest would miss and the cycle repeat.
This is why I say you change things Ra has said, because this statement or understanding of yours is nowhere in the Ra material, it's your own invention. Then when I give you the Ra excerpt to point out your error, you answer in the most confusing and ambiguous way, that it actually makes no sense. Not only do you change a very basic understanding about the progression of the densities, you preamble it with "the channelings make it clear"...
Minya Wrote:Took me a few seconds to find a quote where Ra called the third cycle the one of self-awareness. So seems that in your own example of saying I say things Ra did not say, you did so yourself and said something unlike Ra's teachings to negate something I said which was in accordance.
My error, which doesn’t negate what I said above.
Minya Wrote:I extrapoliate from things more than change anything.
No, you change things, as my example shows.