10-06-2010, 10:50 PM
I think that we are referring to the same ideas by 2 different terms. Socialism and "collective socialism" (anarchism) emotional meanings have a long history of enmity due to the "love" of the elite to confuse and create chaos and division. But basically the goals are the same in the way unity100 and Eddie are applying them.
At the beginning of 4th + I can still see some form of government in order to clear things up. But no fear, negative entities cannot exploit at that time.
I think "socialism" is referring to UNITY (necessary to create a soul complex), and "anarchism" as freedom. We can have both. Language has great limitations and one of them is the manipulation that historically, has been given to them. Paraphrasing Derrida: "everything is context".
Nonetheless, I have to say that the paving for 4d+ is happening as we speak and I can see (most probably wanderers) Hugo Chavez, Evo Morales for example, as starting to give some definition to these amorphous concepts (obviously with the help of people voting for them) but it is reassuring they are playing the cards on the same table...
At the beginning of 4th + I can still see some form of government in order to clear things up. But no fear, negative entities cannot exploit at that time.
I think "socialism" is referring to UNITY (necessary to create a soul complex), and "anarchism" as freedom. We can have both. Language has great limitations and one of them is the manipulation that historically, has been given to them. Paraphrasing Derrida: "everything is context".
Nonetheless, I have to say that the paving for 4d+ is happening as we speak and I can see (most probably wanderers) Hugo Chavez, Evo Morales for example, as starting to give some definition to these amorphous concepts (obviously with the help of people voting for them) but it is reassuring they are playing the cards on the same table...