(07-28-2016, 02:55 PM)Minyatur Wrote:(07-28-2016, 02:02 PM)YinYang Wrote: Where did Ra say it's impossible to judge the polarity of an act or an entity?
Quote:93.3 Questioner: Thank you. The foundation of our present illusion we have stated previously to be the concept of polarity. I would ask that since we have defined the two polarities as service to others and service to self, is there a more complete or eloquent or enlightening definition or any more information that we don’t have at this time on the two ends of the poles that would give us a better insight into the nature of polarity itself?
Ra: I am Ra. It is unlikely that there is a more pithy or eloquent description of the polarities of third density than service to others and service to self due to the nature of the mind/body/spirit complexes’ distortions towards perceiving concepts relating to philosophy in terms of ethics or activity. However, we might consider the polarities using slightly variant terms. In this way a possible enrichment of insight might be achieved for some.
One might consider the polarities with the literal nature enjoyed by the physical polarity of the magnet. The negative and positive, with their electrical characteristics, may be seen to be just as in the physical sense. It is to be noted in this context that it is quite impossible to judge the polarity of an act or an entity, just as it is impossible to judge the relative goodness of the negative and positive poles of the magnet.
Another method of viewing polarities might involve the concept of radiation/absorption. That which is positive is radiant; that which is negative is absorbent.
I find this a little contradictory then in the face of the foundation of the material which lays out the distinction between the two polarities. If we take a known case of an almost life long enslavement and rape of one entity by another against her will, like the Fritzl case, is it then impossible to ascribe that act to the negative polarity? Sorry to use such a horrific example, but that was at least one instance where I was 100% sure I'm looking at evil.