Session 31 - As a Gay Man, I think Ra's take on Homosexuality is idiotic

[Jade]

I'm disappointed. On Scott's website, it says that he will offer his services regardless of ability to pay, so I assumed that he engaged seekers in his email. I'm sorry that I was wrong.

Regardless of what Scott thinks or says or the language he uses is out of date or insensitive ... At the end of it (literally) Ra still refers to what we are thinking of as "gay people" as having an "impairment" - for which I can only find definitions to imply a disability or a non-desirable status.

I think if we go to the previous session, session 30, we can see where Ra is first talking about the bisexual mechanism.

30.9 Questioner: Now, in second density the concept of bisexual reproduction first originates. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

30.10 Questioner: Can you tell me the philosophy behind this mechanism of propagation of the bodily complex?

Ra: I am Ra. The second density is one in which the groundwork is being laid for third-density work. In this way it may be seen that the basic mechanisms of reproduction capitulate into a vast potential in third density for service to other-self and to self; this being not only by the functions of energy transfer but also [by] the various services performed due to the close contact of those who are, shall we say, magnetically attracted, one to the other; these entities thus having the opportunities for many types of service which would be unavailable to the independent entity.

30.11 Questioner: Was the basic reason, the original reason for this then to increase opportunity for experience of the One Creator? Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is not merely correct but is the key to that which occurs in all densities.

Basically, the Logos chose dual genders as a means of creating dynamic without any effort on the part of incarnated entities - and if one is not engaging in this "magnetic attraction" dynamic there is an impairment in their ability to offer service to another without the effort involved in finding another mate of similar orientation - homosexuals making up an estimated 2% of the population. A shallow example of this is how a man will go out of his way to open a door for a woman, as a means of service and potential courting. This simple dynamic is baffled if the entities involved aren't heterosexual. But, if unbaffled, it offers an "automatic" service to be performed, as I'm sure most men don't contemplate the movement to making an act of "chivalry" towards a woman - at least, from my experience, it's incredibly impulsive and without thought.

This is all meant to generate the most catalyst possible. In theory it's easier for two male entities to bridge the gap between their differences than a male and a female. The polarized genders creates a dynamic that can be used. Lacking involvement in polarized genders would, in this context, be an "impairment", because it is a missed "increase [in] opportunity for experience of the One Creator" that is offered by the dynamic of dual genders.