Session 31 - As a Gay Man, I think Ra's take on Homosexuality is idiotic

[Chandlersdad]

I'm disappointed. On Scott's website, it says that he will offer his services regardless of ability to pay, so I assumed that he engaged seekers in his email. I'm sorry that I was wrong.

Regardless of what Scott thinks or says or the language he uses is out of date or insensitive ... At the end of it (literally) Ra still refers to what we are thinking of as "gay people" as having an "impairment" - for which I can only find definitions to imply a disability or a non-desirable status.

I think if we go to the previous session, session 30, we can see where Ra is first talking about the bisexual mechanism.

30.9 Questioner: Now, in second density the concept of bisexual reproduction first originates. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

30.10 Questioner: Can you tell me the philosophy behind this mechanism of propagation of the bodily complex?

Ra: I am Ra. The second density is one in which the groundwork is being laid for third-density work. In this way it may be seen that the basic mechanisms of reproduction capitulate into a vast potential in third density for service to other-self and to self; this being not only by the functions of energy transfer but also [by] the various services performed due to the close contact of those who are, shall we say, magnetically attracted, one to the other; these entities thus having the opportunities for many types of service which would be unavailable to the independent entity.

30.11 Questioner: Was the basic reason, the original reason for this then to increase opportunity for experience of the One Creator? Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is not merely correct but is the key to that which occurs in all densities.

Basically, the Logos chose dual genders as a means of creating dynamic without any effort on the part of incarnated entities - and if one is not engaging in this "magnetic attraction" dynamic there is an impairment in their ability to offer service to another without the effort involved in finding another mate of similar orientation - homosexuals making up an estimated 2% of the population. A shallow example of this is how a man will go out of his way to open a door for a woman, as a means of service and potential courting. This simple dynamic is baffled if the entities involved aren't heterosexual. But, if unbaffled, it offers an "automatic" service to be performed, as I'm sure most men don't contemplate the movement to making an act of "chivalry" towards a woman - at least, from my experience, it's incredibly impulsive and without thought.

This is all meant to generate the most catalyst possible. In theory it's easier for two male entities to bridge the gap between their differences than a male and a female. The polarized genders creates a dynamic that can be used. Lacking involvement in polarized genders would, in this context, be an "impairment", because it is a missed "increase [in] opportunity for experience of the One Creator" that is offered by the dynamic of dual genders. 

This may come as a great shock, but gay men interact with women all the time. Gay men often share a feminine outlook on life versus the straight male. When I read that book about MEN ARE FROM MARS, WOMEN ARE FROM VENUS, I related perhaps 90% with the "VENUS" attitudes towards life. Also, gay men exist in a reality unmapped by Ra. This is a reality where they are often in a duality relationship to both women AND to straight men. Straight men are often a great mystery to gay men, especially the more brutish competition obsessed blood and guts loving male. Because Ra did not bother to map out alternative dynamics does not negate the catalysts for growth inherent within the interaction among diverse members of the human species. If you think there is little catalyst or dynamics being gay (and attempting a serious relationship in a hostile society), then you simply lack knowledge and empathy.

Can I be blunt? I am sick and tired of straight men proclaiming the truth about homosexuality. How about instead of proclaiming, you simply ASK GAY PEOPLE?!?!! Would that require too much humility?

Also, for the record, gay men are probably MORE gracious with women than straight men. I always open doors for women, for example. Were you saying that if there is no sexual interest, a man will not treat women with respect and good manners? Women are our mothers. Now THAT is an instinctive dynamic right there. Women are our sisters and friends. When I see a young woman struggling with 2 small children, I instinctively rush to open the door for her or help in any way I can. SHE is the mother of the human race. It doesn't take a fantasy about her vagina to force me to be a decent human being.

Finally, 2% of the population ADMITS to being gay. The real number is much higher. On a planet where gay men are being murdered simply for being gay, in a world where a gay man can be fired for admitting to be gay, in a world where the dominant Western religions curse gay men to damnation and ostracism, in a world where police still target gay men (entrapping them), are you really surprised that only 2% would admit to being gay? Half the gay men I have known in my life (including my husband) were married at one time to a woman. They did as society dictated. It took great courage to step away from that commitment and be themselves. Many gay men do not have that courage and would mark "heterosexual" on a census.

RA can shove his "impairment" up his collective ass. This is a classic example of dogma over reality. If Ra had said the Earth was flat, you would be finding clever ways to support that notion. :@