08-18-2016, 02:36 PM
Wow, there are all sorts of ideas going on in here...
I will expand but I think Ra's words have been taken grossly out of context. The reason for the 'impairment' that Ra associates with homosexuality is because the red-ray energy is both reproductive and part of that initial calling to be of service. Thus the 'impairment' is simply that the individual will have to find an alternative route to move those energies up the centers.
I will be going over this with quotes but basically in Session 31 when they are talking about sexual polarities they do so within the context of 'male/female energies' and essentially suggest that a male or a female could be more dominant in either male or female energies (they say due to previous lives in alternate bodies) and it is the ENERGY that is responsible for the attraction.
Thus, a man with strong male energies and a man with strong female energies would be magnetically attracted in the same way as male and female. However, the 'impairment' then is that the reproductive power of the red-ray cannot be used and this is the 'sexual Confusion's that arises, this determined based on the idea that the sexual drive is biologically connected to reproduction.
With this reproduction is the initial charge towards service to others so those who cannot express themselves through reproduction may still attempt to use sexual energies towards service and thus relationships will be seen and attracted that reflect an acceptable use of this energy and hence the suggestion that in our densely packed cities it is more likely for an individual to encounter someone of the same gender with an opposite charge of the masculine or feminine.
Make no mistake though, Ra says fully that an entity such as this is capable of full green-ray expression and love. People don't have to be 'totally balanced' to either be harvestable or to get in to the green-ray. So I would suggest that maintaining a healthy sense of self and working on mutually serving relationships is just as effective for a homosexual as it is for a heterosexual.
The only 'impairment' is the innate challenge of self-acceptance and getting those reproductive energies moving in some way. My understanding is that many individuals who go in this direction are actually desiring of being of service but not being attracted to reproduction or the opposite gender thus find a 'regularization' for use of this red-ray energy. Therefore, I believe that all Ra was saying is that it is 'challenging' and hence the use of the word 'impairment'.
It is NOT that these people are broken, disabled or anything of the sort, simply that due to the structure of the planet these entities are at a slight 'disadvantage' not due to their capabilities but merely as a result of the state of the social environment. The disadvantage simply being that it will be more difficult to make use of the red-ray energies due to conditions of confusion.
It even seems suggested to me by Ra that the homosexual orientation is actually an internal attempt to balance out this disadvantage. (This disadvantage stems from the very strong 'masculine' and 'feminine' images which are ingrained in society.)
So, all in all, I don't think Ra has ever suggested there is anything 'wrong' with homosexuality and rather instead they highlight the conditions where it might become more common. Their suggestion of 'impairment', if you read the whole session, is clearly related to their discussion of 'bisexual' energies and the difficulties of dealing with the red-ray.
If Scott Mandelker really said any of that stuff, maybe that's why I've never been drawn to listen to him in the slightest.
I will expand but I think Ra's words have been taken grossly out of context. The reason for the 'impairment' that Ra associates with homosexuality is because the red-ray energy is both reproductive and part of that initial calling to be of service. Thus the 'impairment' is simply that the individual will have to find an alternative route to move those energies up the centers.
I will be going over this with quotes but basically in Session 31 when they are talking about sexual polarities they do so within the context of 'male/female energies' and essentially suggest that a male or a female could be more dominant in either male or female energies (they say due to previous lives in alternate bodies) and it is the ENERGY that is responsible for the attraction.
Thus, a man with strong male energies and a man with strong female energies would be magnetically attracted in the same way as male and female. However, the 'impairment' then is that the reproductive power of the red-ray cannot be used and this is the 'sexual Confusion's that arises, this determined based on the idea that the sexual drive is biologically connected to reproduction.
With this reproduction is the initial charge towards service to others so those who cannot express themselves through reproduction may still attempt to use sexual energies towards service and thus relationships will be seen and attracted that reflect an acceptable use of this energy and hence the suggestion that in our densely packed cities it is more likely for an individual to encounter someone of the same gender with an opposite charge of the masculine or feminine.
Make no mistake though, Ra says fully that an entity such as this is capable of full green-ray expression and love. People don't have to be 'totally balanced' to either be harvestable or to get in to the green-ray. So I would suggest that maintaining a healthy sense of self and working on mutually serving relationships is just as effective for a homosexual as it is for a heterosexual.
The only 'impairment' is the innate challenge of self-acceptance and getting those reproductive energies moving in some way. My understanding is that many individuals who go in this direction are actually desiring of being of service but not being attracted to reproduction or the opposite gender thus find a 'regularization' for use of this red-ray energy. Therefore, I believe that all Ra was saying is that it is 'challenging' and hence the use of the word 'impairment'.
It is NOT that these people are broken, disabled or anything of the sort, simply that due to the structure of the planet these entities are at a slight 'disadvantage' not due to their capabilities but merely as a result of the state of the social environment. The disadvantage simply being that it will be more difficult to make use of the red-ray energies due to conditions of confusion.
It even seems suggested to me by Ra that the homosexual orientation is actually an internal attempt to balance out this disadvantage. (This disadvantage stems from the very strong 'masculine' and 'feminine' images which are ingrained in society.)
So, all in all, I don't think Ra has ever suggested there is anything 'wrong' with homosexuality and rather instead they highlight the conditions where it might become more common. Their suggestion of 'impairment', if you read the whole session, is clearly related to their discussion of 'bisexual' energies and the difficulties of dealing with the red-ray.
If Scott Mandelker really said any of that stuff, maybe that's why I've never been drawn to listen to him in the slightest.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)