I didn't mean to put you on the spot or anything, I apologise if it came across that way, Gurdjieff is just a very complex subject, and him, his legacy and his teaching (to this day) causes a lot of suffering and confusion. Have you read this thread and the associated links/documents?
I would just caution against making proclamations like "I would say he was positively polarized because I looked at a picture of his eyes" if you possess little knowledge of this man and his deeds.
I would just caution against making proclamations like "I would say he was positively polarized because I looked at a picture of his eyes" if you possess little knowledge of this man and his deeds.