6D Wanderers: 3D Lessons?

[Sacred Fool]

can Ra be considered service to self ? no. service to others ? according to what they say, yes.

are they polarized ? they say, no.

are they still rendering service ? yes.

therefore, the evident conclusion is, polarity is not service.

I suspect that negation of polarity here is a false construction. RA is STS and is STO. They simply see these as the same thing through the prism of the LOO. In other words, other equals self because all of us, my brother, are simply distortions of the One Creatrix. [By the way, "Creatrix" is the feminine form of "Creator." I find it a touch softer and harbor a preference for that term.]

lets examine something else :

according to Ra, the polarities of 4d graduates harmoniously approach 99%, even though polarization is not a requirement for 4d harvest.

ra says, they are not polarized, and they are not of those of light, or of those of love.

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...c=1&ss=1#1

1.1 Questioner: Do you have a specific purpose, and if so, could you tell us something of what your purpose is?

Ra: I am Ra. We communicate now. We, too, have our place. We are not those of the Love or of the Light. We are those who are of the Law of One. In our vibration the polarities are harmonized, the complexities are simplified, and the paradoxes have their solution. We are one. That is our nature and our purpose.

We are old upon your planet and have served with varying degrees of success in transmitting the Law of One, of Unity, of Singleness to your peoples. We have walked your earth. We have seen the faces of your peoples. This is not so with many of the entities of the Confederation. We found it was not efficaceous. However, we then felt the great responsibility of staying in the capacity of removing the distortions and powers that had been given to the Law of One. We will continue in this until your, shall we say, cycle is appropriately ended. If not this one, then the next. We are not a part of time and, thus, are able to be with you in any of your times.

Does this give you enough information from which to extract our purpose, my brother?

that means, they are neither of love polarity, or, light polarity (negative, apparently, or used in place of it, actually it passes a few times in the early sessions, it is a curious point).

They don't actually use the terms, "light polarity" or "love polarity," now do they? They appear to be referring to the fact that they are not oriented to the Law of Love nor the Law of Wisdom, but to the Law of One.



It's too bad, U, that you aren't paying mind to the many specific quotes that other people are bringing up which refute your premise. That doesn't seem fair.