Session 31 - As a Gay Man, I think Ra's take on Homosexuality is idiotic

[rva_jeremy]

So to identify as gay or heterosexual has little meaning to me. I try to drop these identities. I am female and I am attracted sexually to males. But that doesn't mean I don't ever have sexual feelings for women—they just aren't that strong. But the lines are blurred. And I think the lines are meaningless once you remove procreation and societal judgments (which are ever-changing according to human fears) form the equation. 

For what it's worth, this is kind of my argument too -- and we debated this at length at homecoming this year, late into the night/early morning.  

Lived, experienced sexuality is totally a spectrum and probably several spectra, with lots of interrelated energetic phenomena at play.  In any other form of energy we'd easily acknowledge this, understanding that the poles, the extremes at either end of the spectrum, are ideals or archetypes that one approaches but never reaches 100%.  When those of Ra articulate an ideal when it comes to sexuality, why would we expect a special kind of balance to which we'd never hold ourselves in any other energetic aspect?

This is why I think you have to take Ra's pronouncements with a grain of salt when you apply it to the human experience.  Living according to the Law of One is something to which we aspire, not something we achieve in third density.  Compassion for the actual experience is always therefore appropriate.