I think it's really just a matter of above or bellow the first distortion.
That which is above the first distortion is without change nor growth, it is never more or less and simply is the Source.
That which is under the first distortion exists within relativity and illusion and experiences an infinite/eternal striving for more and this striving (first distortion being infinitely distorted) is what makes the Source what it is (full of infinity).
I'm not entirely sure what was meant by Q'uo but I think it is quite false to say the creation becomes more, only a relative awareness of creation increases in it's perception and for this statement to be true we can only speak of a relative creation (you or me, this planet, star system, universe, etc) and not an absolute creation (infinity). But then again they said "It seems to us" which does denote a form of unsureness about their statement that comes from what they can observe as relative consciousnesses from within a relative creation.
That which is above the first distortion is without change nor growth, it is never more or less and simply is the Source.
That which is under the first distortion exists within relativity and illusion and experiences an infinite/eternal striving for more and this striving (first distortion being infinitely distorted) is what makes the Source what it is (full of infinity).
I'm not entirely sure what was meant by Q'uo but I think it is quite false to say the creation becomes more, only a relative awareness of creation increases in it's perception and for this statement to be true we can only speak of a relative creation (you or me, this planet, star system, universe, etc) and not an absolute creation (infinity). But then again they said "It seems to us" which does denote a form of unsureness about their statement that comes from what they can observe as relative consciousnesses from within a relative creation.