(10-18-2010, 02:42 PM)peregrine Wrote: Okay, other self u., I think maybe we're now staring in the face of your blind spot.
There is a fourth aspect here which you're not accounting for that might explain a lot about my comments that you play like someone who's not in the game.
The fourth aspect is the sinkhole of indifference. My observation is that when you talk about not needing to polarize, you're talking about being indifferent. The fact that you *talk* about all these high flying matters means what? As I read the Ra material, it means nothing: it signifies indifference if there is an absence of polarization.
What determines your efficient use of catalyst in this incarnation is NOT the measure of your indifference (avoidance of polarization), rather, it is the degree to which the vibration of your being more closely resembles that of the Creatrix and this is accomplished through polarization and, as you point out, balancing. So, to refuse to engage in the game and choose to increase polarity you're choosing to be indifferent to the opportunity...which is just fine, but you shouldn't confuse that with stepping forth into the Land of Uncertainly and attempting to more fully serve the Creatrix.
i cant even understand how you bring indifference as relevant to these.
ra is not polarized. are they indifferent ?
Quote:I think you're just making this up. If it were true, then STS polarization would be impossible.
According to Ra the spectral emanation in the violet center is a summation of work done in the other centers. If an imbalance is indicated, it lies somewhere else, not in the indicator.
how did you deduce that ?
if violet BALANCE goes too imbalanced, negative polarization would be impossible indeed.
there is a violet balance for negative polarization too. it involves overemphasis of 2, 3d energy centers, and a lack of 4d green ray.
if, the entity goes way too imbalanced, ie, has too overemphasised orange ray as opposed to much weaker red and yellow rays, then yes, that entity would probably not be able to qualify for 3d negative harvest.
and as a sidenote, we know that strength of red ray is also taken into consideration for negative 4d harvest.
Quote:Well, then, we should all relax and enjoy a nice cigar together, eh?
well not quite. since, apparently, at least this local logos thinks that things should be catalyzed.
(10-18-2010, 04:53 PM)Etude in B Minor Wrote: I always interpreted the lack of emphasis on polarization in 6D by Ra to mean that there is no longer effort to increase the polarization. It does not necessarily mean that the polarization has disappeared. The positive path was mentioned as "that which is" and the negative path as "that which is not". When the negative path-goers enter 6D they move from the negative path to the positive path. This requires a change in their polarization from negative to positive, presumably to move their focus from "that which is not" to "that which is". In higher 6D and 7D and up, every entity is focused on "that which is" and is therefore positively polarized. After this the concept of polarization is not important. But when 6D wanderers move into 3D, they are faced with entities and circumstances which have to do with "that which is not". So there is a possibility for their focus to shift, while in 3D, away from "that which is", maybe a little bit, maybe a lot. In the case of the 4D+ Venusian wanderers who shifted to the dark side, maybe they got interested in some stuff which distracted them.
but they clearly say they are without polarity. they are not saying they are not increasing their polarity.