Event, or no event? Which is it? Also, UFO intervention for 2016/2017??

[anagogy]

Do you have a reason for stating this?
I thought Seth was a 5th Density being...definitely not her higher self IMO
Him giving the information without it being requested, also gives the impression of STS, to me.
The material may be consistent with the Ra material...that doesn't mean the context is positive.

My 2 cents.

It depends how you look at it. And it is just my personal intuition and opinion that this is so. If you see it differently, then all is well.

---

Seth 1: "Now initially Ruburt and Joseph and I were a part of the same entity, or overall identity, and so symbolically speaking, there are psychic currents that unite us. All of these merge into what has often been compared to as an ocean of consciousness, a well from which all actuality springs. Start with any one consciousness, and theoretically you will find all others."

---

There are many versions of Seth. I believe we each have many versions of what might be termed "higher selves". It may not be that Seth fits the exact description of Ra's definition of a higher self. But as a more developed or further along version of Jane and her husbands self, I would say that Seth comprised such a being. Not to mention Seth two. We have inner beings within inner beings within inner beings. It is like two mirrors facing each other stretching off into infinity.

---

Seth 2: "Seth is a point in my reference, in our reference. He is an ancient portion of us. We are separate but united. Always the spirit forms the flesh."

---

Seth 1: "We will continue. There are kinds of consciousness that cannot be deciphered in physical terms. The "personality" who originated the paragraphs you have just read is such a one.
As mentioned, there is the same kind of connection between that personality and myself as the one that exists between Ruburt and myself. But in your terms, Seth Two is far further divorced from my reality than I am from Ruburt's. You can imagine Seth Two as a future portion of me if you prefer, and yet far more is involved."

---

Seth 1: "Seth Two does represent what I will become, to some extent, and in your terms, yet when I become what he is he will be something different. In the same terms now, only, Ruburt may become what I am, but then I will be something far different."

---

Having said all that, the distinction isn't incredibly important to know or understand. All divisions are ultimately arbitrary, so I have no great desire to debate the trivialities of arbitary personality divisions, but those are some quotes that hint that this is so.

And as to him giving information that wasn't requested. I don't think we can really say that definitively. People ask for things with more than just their words. There is also the vibrational asking of all those who would eventually read the amalgamated published material you have to consider. The vibrational asking, and the subsequent vibrational answering. They are one and the same. The call exists without regard to space/time as we understand it. 

Speaking of myself, I know that I was, in my heart, certainly asking for that information. I've always found it to be very positive and empowering information, personally. 

edit: added clarifications