10-23-2010, 11:05 PM
(10-23-2010, 10:52 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: I don't remember which quote you are referring to, but I doubt that Ra meant to use our intuition to decide technical attributes like polarity.
Here's the quote I was referring to:
Quote:58.22 ...Contact with indigo ray need not necessarily show itself in any certain gift or guidepost, as you have said. There are some whose indigo energy is that of pure being and never is manifested, yet all are aware of such an entity’s progress. Others may teach or share in many ways contact with intelligent energy. Others continue in unmanifested form, seeking intelligent infinity.
Thus the manifestation is lesser signpost than that which is sensed or intuited about a mind/body/spirit complex. This violet ray being-ness is far more indicative of true self.
(10-23-2010, 10:52 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: I hope it's a given that Ra's service to us is positive. No question about it.
But that's not necessarily the same as whether Ra has polarity.
No, I don't think you're saying Ra is negative. But I do think you're reluctant to say that Ra is positive.
(10-23-2010, 10:52 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: No! You must do it NOW!

(10-23-2010, 10:52 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: Please see post #188 in which I addressed those terms:
I went back and re-read that post, but I'm not sure which part you're thinking of. Is it this? "I think it depends on what you mean by the term service to others. It's not really a definition of the positive polarity. It is the percentage of service to others that is the definition of positive polarity."
Or this? "Thus, it appears to me that the term service to others, as a description of the positive polarity, cannot be separated. However, as a description of what is actually happening, ie. being of service, then it is distinct from polarity, because surely Ra serves others, yet has no polarity."