10-24-2010, 12:08 PM
(10-23-2010, 05:29 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Actually, there were early news stories that gave the number as 34. See, for example, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-10897327 -- "Chile mine collapse traps 34 miners"
This may explain the missing person...
http://www.speroforum.com/a/41754/God-ne...s-in-Chile
I'd assume a honest mistake and stick with the 33 men.. I could find nothing else that clarifies the situation.
33 is not necessarily a masonic number. The fact that they use numbers doesn't mean numbers belong to them. If we are going to assume they trapped the men down there I personally need more than that number.