6D Wanderers: 3D Lessons?

[Monica]

nine are STO and one is STS. Here we have polarity. Lets say that the one STS switches to STO. Now there is no more polarity. Does that mean that the people are no longer STO? I don't think so.

STO as in being of service, of course not. As I've said, of course they are still serving.

But Ra said that they are no longer of the positive polarity: and Ra also said that both negative and positive polarity becomes history in 6D.

To oversimplify: If there is no longer a 'bad guy' then the concept of 'good guy' becomes irrelevant.

What is polarity but a definition of the dynamic of opposite charges?

in 6D positive/negative polarity becomes history

The only way I can make sense of that quote is that polarity must be something separate from being in service.

It is all that there is.

The dark path is the false path.

Ra didn't say it was a 'false' path. Ra stated that it was a valid path. Ra's description of it as the path which is 'not' doesn't, in my opinion, imply that it's a false path; it just describe the mechanism of the path.

I don't see 1 path as valid and the other as 'false' because, to me, that seems to be viewing the situation thru the lens of separation.

It's like a ripple of distortion within a unified field. Once the distortion reunifies with the field, The unified field is again all there is. The unified field is love.

Ah, but the field is no longer distorted, is it?

And what is distortion? (In this context.) Isn't distortion also part of all that there is? How can it not be?

That's an great analogy! Let's try it, to illustrate the point I have been failing to convey.

First, let's define distortion, as it applies to physical reality. (NOTE: This is NOT a definition of distortion as Ra uses the term.)

from wikipedia:

A distortion is the alteration of the original shape (or other characteristic) of an object, image, sound, waveform or other form of information or representation. Distortion is usually unwanted, and often many methods are employed to minimize it in practice. In some fields, however, distortion is actually desirable; such is the case with electric guitar (where distortion is often induced purposely with the amplifier or an electronic effect to achieve an aggressive sound where desired), or censoring words. The slight distortion of analog tapes and vacuum tubes is considered pleasing in certain music listening situations.

Apparently, some types of distortion can be broken down into components, so I will use that context to illustrate the analogy:

Phase distortion

This form of distortion mostly occurs due to the reactive component, such as capacitive reactance or inductive reactance. Here, all the components of the input signal are not amplified with the same phase shift, hence causing some parts of the output signal to be out of phase with the rest of the output.

To insert STS/STO concepts into the analogy:

The field (the whole) contains distortion (STS) and undistorted (STO) components or parts.

To differentiate those parts, 1 part is labeled distorted (STS) and the other is labeled undistorted (STO).

At some point, the reactive component, or part, that was distorted is no longer distorted.

Without getting into why it's no longer reactive, or how it ceases to be distorted (which is a whole 'nother conversation), what is left?

To say that the part that was undistorted (STO) is still undistorted, as though no change, may be accurate when discussing music or some other physical waves, but I don't think it's accurate when describing 6D. Since all is one, if a component or part changes, does not the entire whole, including the other parts, also change?

If the field is no longer containing any reactive components, ie. areas of distortion, then the entire field has been affected, right?

If, in your analogy, the field is all, which includes the distortion, but then there is no longer distortion, is the field exactly the same as it was before, when there was distortion?

The way I see it, everyone arguing for 'STO' are arguing for half of the field remaining, the half of the field that wasn't distorted.

But since all is one, that half cannot exist alone. It is connected to the distorted half.

So when the distorted half is no longer distorted, what is left is the whole, without any distortion. But this whole is different from the half that was undistorted previously, because now the whole has been affected by the distorted parts changing. The undistorted parts cannot help but be affected, since all is ONE.

I am trying to draw a distinction between the undistorted half, and the undistorted whole. After the distorted half is no longer distorted, it becomes irrelevant to say, "The other half is still undistorted" because, since distortion no longer exists, the very concept of distorted/undistorted has become irrelevant.