6D Wanderers: 3D Lessons?

[Monica]

From our 3D perspective, comming to our aid is an act of STO. From Ra's perpective it is an act of STS because there is nothing else to serve (all is one, one body).

We come to the same conclusion at almost the same time! You posted two minutes before me . I'm a slow typist. LOL!

In the sense of all is ONE, yes, but in the sense of STS/STO as definitions for polarity, I would say neither STS nor STO.

64.5 ...We seek now without polarity. Thus we do not invoke any power from without, for our search has become internalized as we become light/love and love/light. These are the balances we seek, the balances between compassion and wisdom which more and more allow our understanding of experience to be informed that we may come closer to the unity with the One Creator which we so joyfully seek.

4.20 Questioner: My objective is primarily to discover more of the Law of One, and it would be very helpful to discover the techniques of healing. I am aware of your problem with respect to free will. Can you state the Law of One and the laws of healing to me?
Ra: I am Ra. The Law of One, though beyond the limitations of name, as you call vibratory sound complexes, may be approximated by stating that all things are one, that there is no polarity, no right or wrong, no disharmony, but only identity. All is one, and that one is love/light, light/love, the Infinite Creator.

OK, I'm excited to have found this quote!

Ra stated they have become light/love and love/light.

Ra stated that all things are ONE, and there is no polarity...that ONE is love/light, light/love...

So, it logically follows that:

If ONE = love/light, light/love = no polarity

and

Ra = love/light, light/love

then

ONE = love/light, light/love = no polarity = Ra

That pretty much wraps it up for me.

---

Actually, that gives me an idea. Can you agree that Ra is polarized, even if you don't agree that they have polarity?

For me to answer that, can you define polarized?

Here's an interesting tidbit I found on the page you linked:

78.13 Questioner: Then we have, at the beginning of this galactic evolution, an archetypical mind that is the product of the previous octave which this galaxy then used as and acts upon under the first distortion so as to allow for what we experience as polarity. Was there any concept of polarity carried through from the previous octave in the sense of service-to-others or service-to-self polarity?
Ra: I am Ra. There was polarity in the sense of the mover and the moved. There was no polarity in the sense of service-to-self and service-to-others.