12-23-2016, 03:28 PM
The second dictionary definition of law seems to be the intention:
A statement of fact, deduced from observation, to the effect that a particular natural or scientific phenomenon always occurs if certain conditions are present. E.g. "the second law of thermodynamics"
There can be a cognitive dissonance when this definition of "law" is paired with a non-scientific phenomena, such as "love." Law of love. Law of love?
I interpreted the phrasing to bestow absolute factual existence of each described law.
It appears that some of the dimensional areas (3d, 4d etc.) are "bound" by one of these laws. So Ra, from 6th density, says "We are those who are of the Law of One. In our vibration the polarities are harmonized; the complexities are simplified; the paradoxes have a solution. We are one. That is our nature and our purpose." Session 1.
All of us, being 3d creatures, must be able to say something similar, "We are those who are of the Law of Choice. In our vibration the polarities are mixed, the environments are complex, and the paradoxes are rampant. We are many and we are separate. Our nature and our purpose is to choose polarity by striving to learn the Law of Love." (Strange, isn't it? That by striving to understand the "law" of the next dimension is how we trigger and escape the law of the current one?)
I particularly like the Law of Confusion which operates in 3d. There is no god-like enforcer of such a law (which is actually forbearance of action/non-interference). Nonetheless, in factual operation, it is still an immutable law in that, if a higher level being does not follow the law, they get depolarized and diminished. (Is it a zero sum energy exchange? Does some of the higher level entity's spiritual "charge" transfer over to the . . . victim . . . recipient of the "forbidden" clear information? How does that work?)
Some of my best tarot readings come from trying to interpret the juxtapositions of wildly different tarot cards. The way Ra pairs "law" with Light, Love, Confusion, Free Will etc. is that same kind of mental stretch for me. And I think that the words themselves act as mental catalyst. The early seeker reads over the terms. But later, those "law" phrases suddenly pop up as meaningful nuggets of meaning that need to be understood and grokked. I'm still struggling with love/light and light/love and all those similarly paired phrases. Ah well, that's what the next few dimensions are for, right? To learn and apply these more complex concepts? All I need be worried about is making a Choice, with the requisite oomph and charge to it (beyond a mental "I choose STO!") to make it evident to the Harvesters when they look at my "mind/body/spirit complex" at death.
A statement of fact, deduced from observation, to the effect that a particular natural or scientific phenomenon always occurs if certain conditions are present. E.g. "the second law of thermodynamics"
There can be a cognitive dissonance when this definition of "law" is paired with a non-scientific phenomena, such as "love." Law of love. Law of love?
I interpreted the phrasing to bestow absolute factual existence of each described law.
It appears that some of the dimensional areas (3d, 4d etc.) are "bound" by one of these laws. So Ra, from 6th density, says "We are those who are of the Law of One. In our vibration the polarities are harmonized; the complexities are simplified; the paradoxes have a solution. We are one. That is our nature and our purpose." Session 1.
All of us, being 3d creatures, must be able to say something similar, "We are those who are of the Law of Choice. In our vibration the polarities are mixed, the environments are complex, and the paradoxes are rampant. We are many and we are separate. Our nature and our purpose is to choose polarity by striving to learn the Law of Love." (Strange, isn't it? That by striving to understand the "law" of the next dimension is how we trigger and escape the law of the current one?)
I particularly like the Law of Confusion which operates in 3d. There is no god-like enforcer of such a law (which is actually forbearance of action/non-interference). Nonetheless, in factual operation, it is still an immutable law in that, if a higher level being does not follow the law, they get depolarized and diminished. (Is it a zero sum energy exchange? Does some of the higher level entity's spiritual "charge" transfer over to the . . . victim . . . recipient of the "forbidden" clear information? How does that work?)
Some of my best tarot readings come from trying to interpret the juxtapositions of wildly different tarot cards. The way Ra pairs "law" with Light, Love, Confusion, Free Will etc. is that same kind of mental stretch for me. And I think that the words themselves act as mental catalyst. The early seeker reads over the terms. But later, those "law" phrases suddenly pop up as meaningful nuggets of meaning that need to be understood and grokked. I'm still struggling with love/light and light/love and all those similarly paired phrases. Ah well, that's what the next few dimensions are for, right? To learn and apply these more complex concepts? All I need be worried about is making a Choice, with the requisite oomph and charge to it (beyond a mental "I choose STO!") to make it evident to the Harvesters when they look at my "mind/body/spirit complex" at death.