10-26-2010, 05:47 PM
The question is, Unity, in doing that action, are you acting in line with your higher self or your smaller self? i understand you're just trying to prove a point, but I'm talking hypothetically as well.
No matter what happens, everything HAS to "be ok" in the larger sense of things, because there is only ONE universe (the word universe falls short of the concept I want to convey there) for things to be in. There is only ONE infinity and some of the distortions of it, in the smaller sense of things, are a sense of "not going to be ok" or "wrong action being taken".
So, to summarize, big picture = all ok, also known as unity or balance. Small picture = either ok or not ok, also known as duality. From our small perspective, there is certainly the possibility that things can go horribly "wrong". i.e. massive loss of life such as destruction of a planet, or lengthy enslavement of entities such as we're familiar with. In duality, we can label these things as good or bad. In unity, we don't label them because that way of thinking only exists in duality.
If you blast this planet off and turn it into spacedust, massive loss of life would occur. Bad, right? On another level, it's just information that was once structured in one place being scattered to re-structure itself over amounts of time that we can't fathom. On another level, it's just potential being re-distributed.
Does that get to the heart of what you're proposing?
No matter what happens, everything HAS to "be ok" in the larger sense of things, because there is only ONE universe (the word universe falls short of the concept I want to convey there) for things to be in. There is only ONE infinity and some of the distortions of it, in the smaller sense of things, are a sense of "not going to be ok" or "wrong action being taken".
So, to summarize, big picture = all ok, also known as unity or balance. Small picture = either ok or not ok, also known as duality. From our small perspective, there is certainly the possibility that things can go horribly "wrong". i.e. massive loss of life such as destruction of a planet, or lengthy enslavement of entities such as we're familiar with. In duality, we can label these things as good or bad. In unity, we don't label them because that way of thinking only exists in duality.
If you blast this planet off and turn it into spacedust, massive loss of life would occur. Bad, right? On another level, it's just information that was once structured in one place being scattered to re-structure itself over amounts of time that we can't fathom. On another level, it's just potential being re-distributed.
Does that get to the heart of what you're proposing?