What if Ra is a negative entity?

[APeacefulWarrior]

What if Ra is a negative entity instead who distorted Law of One to certain extent for the sake of their own goals? We cannot know for sure, but we also cannot know for sure that they are positive social memory complex as well, only because they said so. We may know however that negative entities can tell anything since distortion is their way of controlling others.

What if they lied and there is no Law of One and the Universe is set up in completely different way? Everything is based on pure faith, it is only up to us to accept what resonates for us or decline what does not.

Well, a couple things.  First, afaik, Ra never directly claimed to be positive.  Rather, Ra said that he seeks without polarity (64.6) which also dovetails with his description of Intelligent Infinity as also being without polarity in 27.6.  This is consistent since he says the next step in his path is to merge with Intelligent Infinity and sacrifice selfness itself for the sake of being part of Oneness.

My basic belief is that beings in late sixth density, like Ra or the Higher-Self/Oversoul he describes, are effectively both polarities at once - unity of energies.  Ra specifically said "any guidance given by the higher self may be seen in either the positive or negative polarity depending upon the choice of a mind/body/spirit complex. (36.12)"  While he doesn't specify that this statement about Oversouls applies to all late-6D entities, it seems a reasonable assumption.  They "broadcast" energies both positive and negative simultaneously, and which set of energies are received is dependent on the choice/polarity of the entity receiving.   Just as Intelligent Infinity is equally willing to be put to either positive or negative use, because it's all the same to I.I.

(This would also explain why Ra had such a hard time talking about negativity, because there's no way he could "force" a heavily-positive group to receive negative messages, any more than one could force an AM radio to receive FM.)

But as to the possibility Ra was lying...  

I find in such cases, usually the best question to ask next is "to what end?"  If Ra were negative, then he would be lying for a reason, and that reason would be self-interested.  But what benefit would there be to Nega-Ra to teach that polarity is an illusion which is eventually abandoned?  And why focus his teachings on Oneness, rather than Selfness - something else he says will be abandoned in time?  The teachings themselves contradict the negative path as described, and really, any concept of negativity overall.

There's really nothing to be gained for Nega-Ra here, which contradicts the idea of deliberate self-interested deception.

The only resolution to this would be to assume the nature of the universe isn't just slightly but rather profoundly different than what Ra described.  But in turn - as others have pointed out - this would mean not just that Ra was wrong/lying about the state of the universe, but that pretty much every "enlightened" prophet, philosopher, or messenger in history had been wrong/lying as well.  

And while it's probably not possible to conclusively disprove such an idea, it seems far enough from plausible that it's probably best to assume that's not the case.