02-03-2017, 12:17 AM
(02-02-2017, 09:45 PM)Minyatur Wrote: I think this is untrue. In most cases I'd agree but this is highly untrue in the case of wanderers because there will be many of them who already contain knowing better than this. This form of compassion has a threshold that is a step of light that allows you to reach a higher and purer degree of love that does not hurt itself with others but instead perceive the meaning, purpose and beauty of suffering.
Suffering, and observing suffering while understanding free will is one thing. It's another thing entirely to contribute to suffering.
I so totally disagree that eating meat is a service. I understand the theory of what you and others are saying. But this a service to whom, to what? Why even do it? Because you want to help the animals? Why not just cause no harm to suffering animals and let them have their free will without trying to control it, or guide them with your superior wisdom? Why is it your job to interpret, control, and be involved in the suffering of other-selves (animals) to the extent you are involved in it in this manner?
Why not just let them be free? Why not let them have the freedom to go about their journeys, as we have, in their own way? In order to do that, you must disengage, detach from any involvement, just as Ra was so careful not to infringe upon free will.
Are you trying to say that some wanderers (and do I presume you are one?) here are so advanced they can eat meat, see the beauty in the suffering of the animals who were tortured and slaughtered, and that makes it okay to contribute to barbaric and inhumane treatment of life forms other than human? Are you going to also contribute to the torture and slaughter of humans because in a higher consciousness you perceive the meaning, purpose, and beauty of suffering? Do you not think, that perhaps, at that level of awareness, you would not be involved in the drama at all?