02-15-2017, 05:59 PM
Quote:82.10 Questioner: Why does this partaking in the original thought have a gradient radially outward? That’s the way I understand your statement.
Ra: I am Ra. This is the plan of the One Infinite Creator. The One Original Thought is the harvest of all previous, if you would use this term, experience of the Creator by the Creator. As It decides to know Itself It generates Itself into that plenum, full of the glory and the power of the One Infinite Creator which is manifested to your perceptions as space or outer space. Each generation of this knowing begets a knowing which has the capacity, through free will, to choose methods of knowing Itself. Therefore, gradually, step by step, the Creator becomes that which may know Itself, and the portions of the Creator partake less purely in the power of the original word or thought. This is for the purpose of refinement of the one original thought. The Creator does not properly create as much as It experiences Itself.
I do not know the big picture, but if you'll not mind my random thoughts coming forth on this matter.
In my novel is a place called The Obliteration, which was essentially the unmanifest plenum of creation, inside of this Obliteration was infinity, timelessness, spacelessness, and a 'returning of' effect on anything placed inside of it rather than created by a 'Creator' entity.
In the novel, the Creator in that place makes the universe, but unbeknownst to it, there are other Creators in the outstretching infinite space of the Obliteration.
So I think the concept of more than one Infinite Creator is feasible in that they too are just manifestations of the Infinite One Infinite.
I highly doubt the 'One Infinite Creator' is an entity to be discovered. I think the quote above might point towards the concept that the One Infinite doesn't manifest until the All unifies back into One, and since we have currently aspects of the All that are not unified with the rest, we lack a manifest OIC, and have rather it's unmanifest self as all of us.
The big picture though seems to be as a big picture within a big picture within a big picture ad infinitum until the entire thing coalesces back into a single Picture, rather than many containing many containing many containing...ad infinitum.
The Big Picture Might Be: Becoming Creator From Every Moment, Place, Time, Experience...etc...
I mean, the OIC seems to be called by those guiding it's creation the One Infinite Creator, and yet it seems unfeasible for an infinite, singular, creating entity to be defined by such terms. It's almost like the name itself is a paradox in that the OIC is not singular, it is in portions definable as finite, and it is as much a destroyer as a creator.
So I think the big picture is literally in the name, to create or become the One Infinite Creator again. To create our 'self' or to on every level some way some how, Become the Creator, whether through 4D Love, 5D Wisdom, 6D Unity, 7D Allness, 8D/1D Dissolution/Emergence, or 9D/2D Guidance (the 8D/1D and 9D/2D name's are speculation, not genuine) or 3D Choosing.
It is baffling to ponder what lies beyond unity, allness, and dissolution back into the higher portions of the creator in the next octave. I like to think the octave above our own will be strange and unique, with some kind of lessons belonging to the unified complexes that move into it from our octave. For all we know, there'll be infinity/unity/creativity complexes of concepts rather than individualization's.
I feel like the octave above this one will be dealing with the pureness of 'ideas' and 'concepts' rather than the forms they produce, and that perhaps things like space/time and time/space will have analogous mirrors up there as something like 'form/memory' or 'dimension/differentiation' that are permeable and interlocking with space/time and time/space concepts. It could all just be an evolution of what currently is.
Such as the Lightbringers, they sound like higher evolution versions of entities like Ra, guiding and aiding, except in this case they do so to an entire octave, rather than to a portion of an octave.
Sorry if this is confusing, I think I'm not right personally, but it's fun to imagine and guess and speculate what sounds possible and what sounds like malarkey.