The victimization of men

[Aion]

Here is another really good Q'uo I stumbled upon about the balancing of masculine and feminine principles at the cultural level: http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._1121.aspx

Thank you for sharing, Aion, about your experience with the distortion of the masculine principal. I think as long as we can keep moving the conversation towards the archetypical view, we can move past blaming each other/the opposite sex for these problems, and instead, see the much larger and more profound act that is currently unfolding. I think it's a valiant effort for us to make to learn to recognize and reconcile the imbalance and the distortions of the masculine/feminine that we have internalized, so that we can then project a healthier balance forward into the group consciousness.

Well, I would say it is a distortion of both masculine and feminine principle, they are not in balance with eachother. My feminine is not very capable of being gentle because it has taken on so many masculine traits. In short, I think that there is no way you can have a distortion in one and not in the other. They are a unified duality and they are defining of eachother, so I think that if there is imbalance in one, there is imbalance in the other, because the 'ground' state is them being in balance together. This is why I honestly don't really believe someone can be balanced in one and not the other. Either your masculine and feminine are in balance together (not static balance, but dynamic, meaning they work as a unit rather than against eachother), or they are out of balance due to distortion. If one is skewed it skews the other. Again, I don't mean in terms of gender role identities, but in terms of the passive and active modes of energy itself and the way it expresses itself through interactions. Each balance as such is unique, so I don't think there is a set manner of identity which can be applied to it.

It is true that socially there are many impressions regarding what is an 'proper' man or woman and this consensus can colour many things. I think this is why it can be good to look more at abstracts, but it's challenging. For example, in the archetypes of the Tree of Life and Kabbalah there are masculine and feminine attributions to the Sephiroth. They designate Binah (Understanding) as feminine and Chokhmah (Wisdom) as masculine. Of course they acknowledge that both have both but that certain archetypes are more dominant one way or the other. Notably, Ra also makes this assessment of the Tarot and that certain cards have masculine and feminine attributions. Thus it is strongly suggested to me that masculine and feminine are 'more primal' distortions than the Archetypes, however, what we see is that these things actually only emerge in second-density.

30.9 Questioner: Now, in second density the concept of bisexual reproduction first originates. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

30.10 Questioner: Can you tell me the philosophy behind this mechanism of propagation of the bodily complex?

Ra: I am Ra. The second density is one in which the groundwork is being laid for third-density work. In this way it may be seen that the basic mechanisms of reproduction capitulate into a vast potential in third density for service to other-self and to self; this being not only by the functions of energy transfer but also [by] the various services performed due to the close contact of those who are, shall we say, magnetically attracted, one to the other; these entities thus having the opportunities for many types of service which would be unavailable to the independent entity.

30.11 Questioner: Was the basic reason, the original reason for this then to increase opportunity for experience of the One Creator? Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is not merely correct but is the key to that which occurs in all densities.

This was already established in humans according to Ra since we had been second-density apes which were then modified. This means that we carried the ancestral data and awareness of ourselves as bisexual through the primate form and that the roots of our consciousness are tied to that collective, as our 'racial memory' as Ra might put it.

31.9 Questioner: Why does density of population create these confusions?

Ra: I am Ra. The bisexual reproductive urge has as its goal, not only the simple reproductive function, but more especially the desire to serve others being awakened by this activity.

In an over-crowded situation where each mind/body/spirit complex is under a constant bombardment from other-selves it is understandable that those who are especially sensitive would not feel the desire to be of service to other-selves. This also would increase the probability of a lack of desire or a blockage of the red-ray reproductive energy.

In an uncrowded atmosphere this same entity would, through the stimulus of feeling the solitude about it, then have much more desire to seek out someone to whom it may be of service thus regularizing the sexual reproductive function.

We have also had the consciousness of the Maldekians added to our collective consciousness, whom Ra described as quite 'bellicose'. This means that we have not just been working on our own planet's karma per se, but we are also resolving all the issues developed on Maldek. So, there is a lot of trauma spread across our planet.

However, there are things I have seen regarding Atlantis which have become part of this all. Most people focus on the technology and the fall of Atlantis as being the great tragedy of that civilization. That is actually only the outcome of the true tragedy which is the subjugation of the Goddess.