The consequence of turning femanine equality into an ideology

[Diana]

My post was focused on mothers, not necessarily because I primarily attribute the problem to mothers (functionally unimportant); but because in my view nobody ever wants to even consider their culpability.

It actually did primarily attribute the problem to mothers, citing them as the “source” of all of these woes.

On both sides of the above exchange, which I am using as an example, there are only perceptions. Let's remember that in all cases here, as we canvass the cutting edge of change and growth. Casting blame and being defensive is not going to help us move forward.

To some I know it is not easy to see the 3D self as an empowered being, and not as society's (or other) victim. And also, there may be difficulty in resolving the two ideas. There is a lot of suffering here. But if any of us is here to help this place (or even just self), then how to do that? It is my working theory that we do that by helping to (for lack of a better phrase) raise the vibration to one of "love" (which—the word love—has so much more meaning than the 3D versions ingrained in our societies). I know how vague and possibly "new age" that sounds, and I don't mean it that way at all. It's just trying to reach the "higher ground." It's shifting focus to what one wants instead of what one doesn't want. I also realize that some individuals are looking for validation. Or that some want to be part of 3D change in a 3D way such as activism. It's all accepted, but spending time on pointing fingers at words on a page isn't really helpful from my view. Although it does create catalyst. So who am I to suggest it's not the best way? It's just not as direct in forging real change. (In my opinion, of course.)

Validation does not necessarily involve agreement. Agreement is based on perception. And we are all individual expressions with vast amounts of individual experiences which create unique and nuanced perceptions.