05-13-2017, 08:53 PM
(05-13-2017, 01:54 PM)Diana Wrote:(05-13-2017, 12:56 PM)Aion Wrote: The Creator is outside of time and space, beyond past, future AND present. It is whole and complete, unified. It is only an active experience of 'being explored' from within the context of space and time, but I strongly feel that this octave is already completed. The reason for this is the fact that the next octave already exists, Ra's teachers even came from there. So if the next octave is already engaged then why would I presume this one 'isn't finished'?
Because all things are evolving, even the so-called Creator. How could it not be? It would mean everything is finite if it was already set in stone. And as each particle or part experiences and evolves so must everything. So it is more like an evolving, dynamic soup. At least, that's my working theory. Even a "unified whole" can change, evolve, grow in content. Frankly I think that is an explanation in 3D why the universe appears to be expanding.
So outside the construct of linear time, where everything is simultaneous, change, flux, expansion and growth would all happen simultaneously with multidimensional connections and synergy, with the sum of the parts being greater than the whole which in turn evolves. Exponential growth and expansion on a level difficult to fathom when immersed in linear time. It's much too linear for me to think there is a line from Creator to self, then a line back to Creator (or whatever the source is).
So because of choices made now, the whole changes. One's path evolves. So to say this density or octave is finished is to disregard possibilities which are infinite. I don't mean to be obtuse here, or vague. I am trying to get across the idea that we are creating everything in the moment, which concept has a lot of validity on many levels, and therefore to say something is finished is perhaps an inaccurate word.
I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. It can be already known/travelled, yet we can come back through "time" to tweak things or simply to reexperience them. The tweaks though come from the perspective of having evolved and seeing things from a more expanded perspective. That's just the understanding I'm getting so not saying anyone else is wrong, I just don't think it has to be one or the other necissarily.