Central Logos of this universe ?

[Aaron]

what is this '4th dimensional answer' or '4th dimensional thinking' anyway ? is it something like 'IAM' thing that is being advocated by some sources in spiritual literature ?

just what is it ?

It's not any kind of dogma, specific spiritual lingo, or anything. It's simply the type of answer I gave, which is from a slightly different perspective from what's considered normal.

it isnt close minded, actually its elementary just like how 'there can be only one infinity - therefore all are from that one infinity'.

for one thing to be considered existing, it needs to affect other existing entities. only then it can be considered existing within a given reality.

even if the entity is in another dimension, but affecting this one very subtly through different effects, it means its still existing.

so goes gravity. actually gravity/attraction is in the basis of dewey physics, and in dewey physics the first thing to exists, is one that attracts.

Yep, it's a logical process to verify the existence of an object using gravity as a qualifier. But that only works up to third density. I think you're absolutely spot on when you say that for something to count as existing, it must affect something else in existence. In my understanding, that's how the universe works. But can't something exist without gravity that still affects other things in existence? What about a thought?

actually this was described by Ra. they said the existence follows a hierarchical expansion pattern. logos follows logos and is its sublogos, down to the individual entity manifesting incarnated in a body (us, other entities).

so, each sublogos comes from/draws energy from its own logos. so, its the former, of what you said.

black holes, ra says, are places where entities merge with 'the one creator'.

I agree with you on all those points. I was wondering about the somewhat trivial point of whether or not the hierarchical pattern goes somewhat like this: GSS, sub-logos (galactic, also simply called logos by Ra), sub-logos (planetary, such as our sun), sub-sub-logos (intelligent beings on a planet such as you or I). This is the way it's mentioned in the Ra material; but that could be due to Don not questioning about higher logoi than the galactic.

If that's the case, it would go possibly like this: GSS, sub-logos (logos creating a local cluster of galaxies), sub-sub-logos (galactic), sub-sub-sub-logos (planetary, such as our sun), sub-sub-sub-sub-logos (intelligent beings on a planet such as you or I).

It's even possible to speculate another logos into there as the being that maintains what's known in astronomy as a "supercluster" of galaxies. Like I said, it's kind of a trivial point though.