07-09-2017, 07:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-09-2017, 07:38 PM by BlatzAdict.)
(04-28-2017, 12:00 PM)Diana Wrote:(04-28-2017, 02:13 AM)Aaron Wrote:Quote:Diana
I like the way Klautz-Veller talks about taking responsibility. I feel this is more to the point than being scared toward "Christ" energy. Perhaps it wasn't meant in the way I am interpreting it, but this is where careful use of words comes in.
The bit about being "scared" towards Christ energy relates to the function of the negative polarity in providing the impetus for polarization, and how that is manifesting here on Gaia.
Oaky, I understand now what you meant by that.
(04-28-2017, 02:13 AM)Aaron Wrote: And I agree with you when you say it is too vague to say "align with unconditional love, or the like". That is why I am saying
Quote:All of these systems are perpetuated by the root system of money. One of the reasons why these structures are so effective is because they are interconnected and interdependent. This is also their weakness. They can all be transformed into hyper-efficient, positive systems which serve humanity and Gaia's ecosystem, if they are reformed with love and true understanding.
I think, in terms of inspiring people, it would be efficacious to really explain your views on money. Harald said in one interview that he owns a building. So clearly he doesn't just live off the land and not participate in the money system.
Money itself is not the problem, the system is. Money just represents choices in this time. We are ingrained with negative attitudes about money to keep us powerless. These subconscious attitudes—"money is the root of all evil" "I'm not materialistic" "rich people are a**holes" "money can't buy what really matters" and on and on—are misdirection from the real issues of greed, self interest, no compassion or empathy, etc. by those in control.
So, I would try to distinguish between an inert system of exchange and the corrupt system of control. (It is one huge leap between where we are now and a loving, giving, compassionate population.) Most people will be frightened at the thought of the "money system" collapsing. It's not just losing "things," it's even having enough to eat—survival.
i'm keeping my eye on e currency for the moment but have not invested anything yet. waiting to get my resources in order.
however, I'd like to point out that the main money system is currently dictated by a babylonian money magick scheme based on fear and lack at the basis of it's underlying philosophy. In addition to that, more wealth is generated by the system of interest, where the usual individual would get something like 1% based on their total savings or whatever it is. While the big banks usually make upwards of 200-300% on the money or effort that you keep in the bank.
You are correct in that money is not the root of the problem persay since it is an equivalent of energy, however due to the current market of hedge funds and other investment firms, it becomes a very, divine masculine sided operation, rather than the integration of the divine masculine and the divine feminine, which is expansion and contraction.
money cannot be created by interest, because it is making something out of nothing, instead of having a value based market, we currently have a fiat based system that is based on speculation, it is a system designed to crash every 7 years.
In accordance with the new energy incoming into the planet, there must be a system of credit that does not over inflate itself based on a rate charged for lending, but instead change over to a value based system based on abundance, rather than lack.
One of the movies I think about a lot in relation to this is Trading Places (1983) Eddie Murphy begins to make the same choices and act out from the same standpoint as the elite that he takes the place of, because it is a movie that is the editorial of reality showing you that even with the best ambitions rising to the top with the current system only allows one to perpetuate it. Instead of bringing the change that one would assume, one is hindered by the same problems brought on by the same system in the first place.
What types of other proof might we have to prove this?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bruceupbin/...e5f5e35105
"Three systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich have taken a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide and analyzed all 43,060 transnational corporations and share ownerships linking them. They built a model of who owns what and what their revenues are and mapped the whole edifice of economic power."
The top 20 Corporations.
"1. Barclays plc
2. Capital Group Companies Inc
3. FMR Corporation
4. AXA
5. State Street Corporation
6. JP Morgan Chase & Co
7. Legal & General Group plc
8. Vanguard Group Inc
9. UBS AG
10. Merrill Lynch & Co Inc
11. Wellington Management Co LLP
12. Deutsche Bank AG
13. Franklin Resources Inc
14. Credit Suisse Group
15. Walton Enterprises LLC (holding company for Wal-Mart heirs)
16. Bank of New York Mellon Corp
17. Natixis
18. Goldman Sachs Group Inc
19. T Rowe Price Group Inc
20. Legg Mason Inc"