Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio A proposal

    Thread: A proposal


    xise (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 1,909
    Threads: 52
    Joined: Mar 2012
    #52
    07-22-2017, 04:15 PM (This post was last modified: 07-22-2017, 04:21 PM by xise.)

    Forum guidelines about STS philosophies really seem to follow's Ra own advice regarding interaction with negatives (a negative greeting in the case below with Carla). We see and recognize them as the Creator, but we are not in resonance with them, we wish them love, light, peace, joy, and bid them well. I think positive polarity interaction with negative philosophies is similar to treating a distortion - we recognize it and accept that is/was a part of us, we learn what the undistorted view is, and then we move past it - it'll always be a part of us in terms of being a part of our memory. At the end of the day, the negative path is just a distorted-imbalanced ray configuration where the green and blue rays are highly distorted and almost fully closed. I think many here understand this and are ready to move past such distortions, and for those who are not, there are always other forums. That being said, most of what is happening here is as others have said, just individuals playing out their own psychodrama as opposed to hardcore STS discussions.



    -----


    67.8 Questioner: In order for this group to be fully in service to the Creator, since we recognize this fifth-density entity as the Creator, we must also attempt to serve, in any way we can, this entity. Is it possible for you to communicate to us the desires of this entity if there are any in addition to simply ceasing the reception and dissemination of that which you provide for us?

    Ra: I am Ra. This entity has two desires. The first and foremost is to, shall we say, misplace one or more of this group in a negative orientation so that it may choose to be of service along the path of service to self. The objective which must precede this is the termination of the physical complex viability of one of this group while the mind/body/spirit complex is within a controllable configuration. May we say that although we of Ra have limited understanding, it is our belief that sending this entity love and light, which each of the group is doing, is the most helpful catalyst which the group may offer to this entity.



    67.10 Questioner: We have a paradoxical situation in that in order to fully serve the Creator at this level in the polarized section, you might say, of the Creation, we have requests, from those whom we serve in this density, for Ra’s information. In fact, I just had one by telephone a short while ago. However, we have requests from, in this particular case, another density not to disseminate this information. We have the Creator, in fact, requesting two seemingly opposite activities of this group. It would be very helpful if we could reach a condition of full, total, complete service in such a way that we were by every thought and activity serving the Creator to the very best of our ability. Is it possible for you to solve, or possible for the fifth-density entity who offers its service to solve, the paradox that I have observed?

    Ra: I am Ra. It is quite possible.



    67.11 Questioner: Then how could we solve this paradox?

    Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, that you have no ability not to serve the Creator since all is the Creator. In your individual growth patterns appear the basic third-density choice. Further, there are overlaid memories of the positive polarizations of your home density. Thus your particular orientation is strongly polarized towards service to others and has attained wisdom as well as compassion.

    You do not have merely two opposite requests for service. You will find an infinite array of contradictory requests for information or lack of information from this source if you listen carefully to those whose voices you may hear. This is all one voice to which you resonate upon a certain frequency. This frequency determines your choice of service to the One Creator. As it happens this group’s vibratory patterns and those of Ra are compatible and enable us to speak through this instrument with your support. This is a function of free will.

    A portion, seemingly, of the Creator rejoices at your choice to question us regarding the evolution of spirit. A seemingly separate portion would wish for multitudinous answers to a great range of queries of a specific nature. Another seemingly separate group of your peoples would wish this correspondence through this instrument to cease, feeling it to be of a negative nature. Upon the many other planes of existence there are those whose every fiber rejoices at your service and those such as the entity of whom you have been speaking which wish only to terminate the life upon the third-density plane of this instrument. All are the Creator. There is one vast panoply of biases and distortions, colors and hues, in an unending pattern. In the case of those with whom you, as entities and as a group, are not in resonance, you wish them love, light, peace, joy, and bid them well. No more than this can you do for your portion of the Creator is as it is and your experience and offering of experience, to be valuable, needs be more and more a perfect representation of who you truly are. Could you, then, serve a negative entity by offering the instrument’s life? It is unlikely that you would find this a true service. Thus you may see in many cases the loving balance being achieved, the love being offered, light being sent, and the service of the service-to-self oriented entity gratefully acknowledged while being rejected as not being useful in your journey at this time. Thus you serve One Creator without paradox.
    [+] The following 3 members thanked thanked xise for this post:3 members thanked xise for this post
      • Cainite, sjel, Steppingfeet
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-20-2017, 05:09 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-20-2017, 06:09 PM
    RE: A proposal - by sjel - 07-20-2017, 07:11 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Minyatur - 07-20-2017, 08:22 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-21-2017, 02:24 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Karl - 07-21-2017, 03:06 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Jade - 07-21-2017, 11:28 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Minyatur - 07-21-2017, 12:45 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 12:45 PM
    RE: A proposal - by sjel - 07-21-2017, 02:46 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Minyatur - 07-21-2017, 02:57 PM
    RE: A proposal - by smc - 07-21-2017, 12:55 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Diana - 07-21-2017, 01:26 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 01:32 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 12:59 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-21-2017, 03:36 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Karl - 07-21-2017, 01:03 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 01:09 PM
    RE: A proposal - by sjel - 07-21-2017, 02:10 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Night Owl - 07-21-2017, 03:24 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Jade - 07-21-2017, 04:43 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Minyatur - 07-21-2017, 05:10 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Diana - 07-21-2017, 06:12 PM
    RE: A proposal - by sjel - 07-21-2017, 08:27 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 04:53 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Jade - 07-21-2017, 05:12 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 05:20 PM
    RE: A proposal - by sjel - 07-21-2017, 05:14 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Cainite - 07-21-2017, 05:17 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Minyatur - 07-21-2017, 05:30 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 05:40 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Minyatur - 07-21-2017, 05:45 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 06:12 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Minyatur - 07-21-2017, 06:55 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Glow - 07-21-2017, 07:50 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 08:17 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 08:29 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-21-2017, 09:03 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-21-2017, 09:09 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Jade - 07-22-2017, 10:33 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Minyatur - 07-22-2017, 11:40 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Diana - 07-22-2017, 01:29 PM
    RE: A proposal - by sjel - 07-23-2017, 12:57 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Glow - 07-23-2017, 09:47 AM
    RE: A proposal - by sjel - 07-23-2017, 04:34 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-22-2017, 12:42 AM
    RE: A proposal - by sjel - 07-22-2017, 02:44 AM
    RE: A proposal - by AnthroHeart - 07-22-2017, 10:48 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Jade - 07-22-2017, 11:13 AM
    RE: A proposal - by xise - 07-22-2017, 11:37 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Jade - 07-22-2017, 11:45 AM
    RE: A proposal - by smc - 07-22-2017, 11:59 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Minyatur - 07-22-2017, 01:00 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Jade - 07-22-2017, 02:37 PM
    RE: A proposal - by xise - 07-22-2017, 04:15 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Diana - 07-22-2017, 04:22 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Cainite - 07-22-2017, 04:47 PM
    RE: A proposal - by xise - 07-22-2017, 06:17 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Diana - 07-22-2017, 06:31 PM
    RE: A proposal - by xise - 07-22-2017, 07:03 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Diana - 07-22-2017, 07:22 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-24-2017, 04:16 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Night Owl - 07-22-2017, 04:27 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-22-2017, 04:45 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Night Owl - 07-22-2017, 06:01 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-22-2017, 04:41 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-22-2017, 05:10 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-22-2017, 06:28 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Night Owl - 07-22-2017, 08:04 PM
    RE: A proposal - by YinYang - 07-22-2017, 09:15 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Diana - 07-23-2017, 08:17 PM
    RE: A proposal - by YinYang - 07-24-2017, 03:29 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Diana - 07-24-2017, 03:39 PM
    RE: A proposal - by sjel - 07-23-2017, 07:28 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-23-2017, 09:21 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Glow - 07-23-2017, 11:15 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-23-2017, 11:19 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-24-2017, 12:54 AM
    RE: A proposal - by isis - 07-24-2017, 10:15 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-24-2017, 12:59 AM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-24-2017, 04:36 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Aion - 07-24-2017, 04:49 AM
    RE: A proposal - by Bring4th_Austin - 07-24-2017, 02:40 PM
    RE: A proposal - by YinYang - 07-24-2017, 03:46 PM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-24-2017, 03:52 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Cainite - 07-24-2017, 04:01 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Cainite - 07-24-2017, 04:04 PM
    RE: A proposal - by Aaron - 07-25-2017, 01:27 AM
    RE: A proposal - by GentleReckoning - 07-24-2017, 05:06 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode