07-29-2017, 02:38 PM
(07-29-2017, 02:32 PM)Diana Wrote:(07-29-2017, 02:25 PM)Jeremy Wrote: Can you find a reference in the material that states 2nd density animals are other selves?
I won't take the time to do that, because, of course they are. "Are you not all things?" would perhaps cover it.
Nope all things and other selves are used in different contexts. An other self directly involves the polarization process within 3rd density. Since you won't I already did last night. There isn't a single reference that I could find that portrayed a second density entity as an other self. I Just went over this a few posts up. The closest I can find with both terms even in the same subject was this which directly states that one person is an other self and the bull is a 2nd density animal
42.3 Questioner: I will attempt to make an analogy. If an animal, shall I say a bull in a pen, attacks you because you have wandered into his pen, you get out of his way rapidly but you do not blame him. Or, you do not have much of an emotional response other than the fear response that he might damage you. However, if you encounter another self in his territory and he attacks you, your response may be more of an emotional nature creating physical bodily responses. Am I correct in assuming that when your response to the animal and to the other-self seeing both as the Creator and loving both and understanding their action in attacking you is the action of their free will then you have balanced yourself correctly in this area? Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is basically correct. However, the balanced entity will see in the seeming attack of an other-self the causes of this action which are, in most cases, of a more complex nature than the cause of the attack of the second-density bull as was your example. Thus this balanced entity would be open to many more opportunities for service to a third-density other-self.