(08-09-2017, 04:16 PM)Spooner Wrote: Ra didn't say muhammad was legit. He said he introduced a "more intelligible" conception of the Law of One. Remember the Law of One can also be understood through negative polarity which certainly seems to be the path of Mohammud who was a warlord.
Last time I checked, negative warlords don't introduce more intelligible conceptions of Law of One.
Quote:"Abandoning racist and un-islamic beliefs" sounds a little naive. There are real differences between people groups and ideologies. It's up to you to judge if these are preferable or not. Negativity enters when you seek to enslave or oppress other-selves (Submission = Islam, a religion spread through conquest). Choosing to be separate and to walk a distinct path is not negative. This would involve coming to rational understanding of the distinctions between modes of being and a rejection of negative paths.
I said Anti Islamic, not un-islamic. I dont have islamic beliefs.