08-14-2017, 11:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-14-2017, 11:17 PM by Steppingfeet.)
(08-14-2017, 01:56 AM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: No Earthly text will ever be able to describe the higher order of things perfectly. The spoken Dao is not the true Dao. Just about every philosophy/cosmology/etc will have elements of truth and elements of falsehood. Everyone is confused, to some extent or another. So there's very little to be gained from getting all self-righteous over differences in opinion over the structure of things; fundamentally it's an argument which can never be "won" and will just tend to increase ill-will on both sides.
Just came across this:
26.4 Questioner: ...I was wondering if the Law of One in either written or spoken form has been made available within this past 3000 years in any complete way such as we’re doing now? Is it available in any other source?
Ra: I am Ra. There is no possibility of a complete source of information of the Law of One in this density. However, certain of your writings passed to you as your so-called holy works have portions of this law.
*********
Also:
28.1 This concept is incorrect as is any concept of the one intelligent infinity.
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi