________

[Infinite]

With all these individuals, we HAVE "factual proofs" as you call it, thanks to their prolific disciples.

It's necessary caution with "anecdotal proofs" derived from reports. These reports never are numerous but so few and no enough to accuse someone. For example, no one acusation against Leadbeater was proofed. Gurdjieff, many times, admited that was pretending (just read the books of your disciples). These negative information generally are motived by ego and jealousy. Yet, many information of their is compatible with "Ra Material". So, it's really necessary caution to judge someone that can't defense yourself anymore.