(11-11-2017, 10:14 AM)MangusKhan Wrote: Do you think it is possible to love someone while simultaneously antagonising them? I do and I do. "The Battle" fundamentally underpins the entire polarised experience. I see it as something to embrace. If one has made it to godhead from this logos without ever having been a warrior or having engaged in battle of some kind, I would question why they ever bothered partaking in the first place. It is not the winning/losing which bewilders the supreme intelligence of the soul in each of us, but rather the attachment to result.
"When two warriors meet, the one without an enemy shall always win." - Laozi
What do you think? I recently invited all forum-partaking entities to criticise me and my thinking, so please tell me honestly and without restraint how you view this particular mode of thought, without fear of consequence or backlash.
"When two warriors meet, the one without an enemy shall always win." - Laozi
The one without any enemies within shall always win. Externally there can always be what seems to be an enemy, but if you have no enemies within, the external version of that will have no damaging capabilities of a fatal or severe nature, and most times any successful attacks will be just severe enough to teach said person something of value.
Also, you still got something in your stache man. lol.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)