(12-13-2017, 03:28 PM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote:Quote:I fully disagree with Jade that it really holds potential to make women uncomfortable,
I'm sorry, but what do you think even gives you the right to say that?
ETA: Oh, you edited your post. So I should feel as benign when I see a rally for men to "fight back" as I do when I experience the color blue, I see. Thank you for offerings your balance to the discussion.
I haven't really seen a rally and instead talking about a subject where men are denied to speak up while there's a greater and greater climate to give blind support to women. It seems like balance here would be an equal ability to speak of both, which is not what I've seen in this thread. If you blocked on the first three words of the title to judge the content of the thread, then it makes sense it went into a fighting climate when it wasn't so much about fighting but how fighting back is denied for men when it would be rightful for them if they were women in the exact same circumstance. If I had to give my impression, I think that if soul A was in life #1 an abused woman you'd give full support to fight back, but if soul A in life #2 was an abused man you'd invalidate the desire to fight back on the same scenario.
Maybe it's because I feel impartial about the subject but it seems obvious to me the reaction it got would be different using all the same thematics and interchanging the genders.
Anyway, my point is more that if we start denying the right to speak about an imbalance because there are other imbalances also, then there isn't much left to talk about.