Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material The Law of Responsibility

    Thread: The Law of Responsibility


    Jade (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 3,351
    Threads: 61
    Joined: Jun 2013
    #36
    12-25-2017, 11:42 AM
    (12-24-2017, 11:53 PM)Coordinate_Apotheosis Wrote: I think I should be free to study the Law of One as I will.  I'm sorry you believe I should endanger myself, as I feel I would be, by partaking further in very powerful catalyst that arise from such intensive areas of advanced study.

    As I said, here to learn Love and Unity.  Not archetypes which I held no resonance with to begin with.

    If you don't come post here to study the Law of One, then why are you posting? I'm not trying to be mean, I'm trying to ask sincerely. I don't come here if I'm not "in the mood" to discuss/study the Law of One, so I project that experience on to everyone. Again, this is the Strictly Law of One subforum. If this was Treehugger's, I'd take the crticism and listen. But I'm just confused. Right now I feel like I'm being made to feel guilty because I made some points that people don't want to listen to. Saying "I'm not ready to hear this" is honest, putting the onus on me and saying that I can't talk about the archetypes because they're "too magical" just really confuses me. I consider the whole of the Ra material magical, and as I've said multiple times, fittingly on topic with the thread, that I believe that we all make an energetic agreement in session 4 with Ra and Don to not shirk the things we have been told by Ra.

    Quote:[60.16]At this space/time we may best serve you, we believe, by stating that the pyramid for meditation along with other rounded and arched or pointed circular shapes is of help to you. However, it is our observation that due to the complexity of influences upon the unmanifested being at this space/time nexus among your planetary peoples it is best that the progress of the mind/body/spirit complex take place without, as you call them, training aids because when using a training aid an entity then takes upon itself the Law of Responsibility for the quickened or increased rate of learn/teaching. If this greater understanding, if we may use this misnomer, is not put into practice in the moment by moment experience of the entity, then the usefulness of the training aid becomes negative.

    This is the Law of Responsibility. The Law of One tomes as a whole would be considered such a training aid, that facilitates a quickened or increased rate of learn/teaching. Either you want to study and PRACTICE the Law of One, or you don't. There are way more instances than what has already been posted of Ra saying that you must teach what you learn or that you suffer consequences. You can't just come here for social interaction, we all have a responsibility to go forward with what we have learned with this philosophy - if it's not for you, that's totally cool, but I believe you have to walk away. There isn't a line drawn where you say, "Oh, what Ra says about the chakras is okay, but the archetypes are too magical to talk about". And you cannot say that I am forcing you to do anything. You have literally clicked on a thread titled The Law of Responsibility. I think there are a lot of lessons to be learned, here.

    Let's try to work with this fear of the archetypes. Why is everyone so afraid? Is it because they sense the increased responsibility more keenly? The way Ra gives us the archetypes are as a means of learning how to use the subconscious mind, and therefore develop our intuition. They ask us to individually, each take the pictures and look at them and create some reference points to the symbology. Presumably, everyone who has read book 4 has already begun this work. When I post the images of two tarot cards after a long rant from an old Russian philosopher, I really thought I couldn't be more protective of others' free will. It was a nudge to the subconscious to give a *very very slight* increased understanding of what the energies mean - for anyone brave enough to drudge through some Tolstoy. There are a lot of steps that one must willingly take on their own, without any coercion on my part. Really, I really do just want to teach what I have learned, as my study of the archetypes has given me a much increased understanding of the nature of catalyst and how to process it. I sincerely believed that everyone who was here was seeking the same increasing clarity.

    Everyone says they want more channeled Ra material, but there is so much to study and learn yet from what has been given to us. The archetypes aren't scary in and of themselves, the whole of the material is magical and carries with it responsibility. The ironic part of everyone's fear of the archetypes is that Ra says that there is more protection, the more one consciously polarizes. It's the random catalyst of the sinkhole that's actually scary!

    Quote:92.31 Questioner: Were the grapes depicted upon the cloth covering the shoulder of the Priestess of Ra’s communication?

    Ra: I am Ra. Yes.

    92.32 Questioner: We have taken those as indicating the fertility of the subconscious mind. Is this correct?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is correct, O student, but note ye the function of the mantle. There is great protection given by the very character of potentiation. To bear fruit is a protected activity.

    92.33 Questioner: The protection here seems to be depicted as being on the right-hand side but not the left. Would this indicate greater protection for the positive path than the negative?

    Ra: I am Ra. You perceive correctly an inborn bias offering to the seeing eye and listing ear information concerning the choice of the more efficient polarity. We would at this time, as you may call it, suggest one more full query.

    Quote:95.24 Questioner: From that statement I interpret the following meaning: That if the Experience of the Mind has sufficiently chosen the right-hand path, as total purity is approached in choosing of the right-hand path, then total imperviousness from the effect of the left-hand catalyst is also approached. Is this correct?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is exquisitely perceptive. The seeker which has purely chosen the service-to-others path shall certainly not have a variant apparent incarnational experience. There is no outward shelter in your illusion from the gusts, flurries, and blizzards of quick and cruel catalyst.

    However, to the pure, all that is encountered speaks of the love and the light of the One Infinite Creator. The cruelest blow is seen with an ambiance of challenges offered and opportunities to come. Thusly, the great pitch of light is held high above such an one so that all interpretation may be seen to be protected by light.
    [+] The following 5 members thanked thanked Jade for this post:5 members thanked Jade for this post
      • MangusKhan, xise, Parsons, Highrculling, 0000
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    The Law of Responsibility - by xise - 12-21-2017, 03:24 PM
    RE: Law of Responsibility - by GentleReckoning - 12-21-2017, 03:33 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Minyatur - 12-21-2017, 05:24 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sprout - 12-21-2017, 05:54 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-21-2017, 08:46 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by rva_jeremy - 12-22-2017, 11:55 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Night Owl - 12-22-2017, 01:11 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Minyatur - 12-22-2017, 01:58 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Night Owl - 12-23-2017, 02:35 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Minyatur - 12-22-2017, 01:46 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by ScottK - 12-22-2017, 10:57 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-23-2017, 10:36 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Minyatur - 12-23-2017, 04:25 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sprout - 12-23-2017, 11:22 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-23-2017, 12:04 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by unity100 - 12-23-2017, 11:30 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sprout - 12-23-2017, 12:28 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-23-2017, 12:41 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sprout - 12-23-2017, 12:55 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-23-2017, 01:11 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sprout - 12-23-2017, 01:27 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-23-2017, 01:44 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sprout - 12-23-2017, 02:10 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 12-23-2017, 01:14 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-23-2017, 01:23 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 12-26-2017, 03:31 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Glow - 12-23-2017, 01:25 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-23-2017, 02:29 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sprout - 12-23-2017, 02:52 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by xise - 12-23-2017, 03:12 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-23-2017, 10:01 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Coordinate_Apotheosis - 12-23-2017, 03:38 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by loostudent - 12-23-2017, 04:20 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Parsons - 12-24-2017, 10:47 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 12-25-2017, 03:04 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Coordinate_Apotheosis - 12-24-2017, 11:53 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-25-2017, 11:42 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Coordinate_Apotheosis - 12-25-2017, 08:08 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-26-2017, 12:14 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 12-26-2017, 02:17 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Jade - 12-28-2017, 11:48 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Diana - 12-28-2017, 12:45 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by CurtisUSA - 12-28-2017, 06:40 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Minyatur - 12-28-2017, 09:01 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Quan - 12-30-2017, 08:38 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 12-31-2017, 05:03 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by hounsic - 12-31-2017, 08:55 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Infinite Unity - 12-31-2017, 11:49 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sprout - 01-01-2018, 03:00 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Dekalb_Blues - 01-03-2018, 03:41 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Minyatur - 12-26-2017, 12:18 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 12-26-2017, 02:26 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Coordinate_Apotheosis - 12-26-2017, 07:31 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Coordinate_Apotheosis - 12-29-2017, 12:26 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by rva_jeremy - 12-29-2017, 12:59 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by rva_jeremy - 12-29-2017, 12:56 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by unity100 - 12-31-2017, 08:16 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 01-01-2018, 05:29 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Infinite Unity - 01-01-2018, 10:47 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 01-01-2018, 03:51 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by unity100 - 01-01-2018, 08:46 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 01-01-2018, 04:21 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Infinite Unity - 01-02-2018, 10:31 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Highrculling - 01-05-2018, 02:40 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by unity100 - 01-08-2018, 08:00 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Infinite Unity - 01-08-2018, 11:49 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 01-10-2018, 06:04 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by unity100 - 01-10-2018, 07:07 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 01-10-2018, 10:26 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by rva_jeremy - 01-11-2018, 01:51 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Sacred Fool - 01-11-2018, 03:35 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by MangusKhan - 01-11-2018, 05:06 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Diana - 01-11-2018, 12:37 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by flofrog - 09-12-2018, 04:10 AM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Nicholas - 01-11-2018, 06:58 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Ankh - 09-10-2018, 01:28 PM
    RE: The Law of Responsibility - by Seth_70/7 - 09-11-2018, 10:49 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode