01-22-2018, 01:55 PM
(01-22-2018, 12:15 PM)elspru Wrote:(01-20-2018, 01:00 PM)Diana Wrote: A consideration in determining what is thrilling, what is boring, what any
reaction to choice and manifestation is, is the mass consciousness here. Without
judgment, everything is equal.
True enough. I've come to the conclusion that the Crusaders are the promoters
of freedom (much like Republicans/right-wing), and the Confederation are the promoters of
compassion (much like Democrats/left-wing).
liberty flattens the bell curve, by making more haves and have nots,
wheras compassion heightens the bell curve, by bringing people towards the
center. The natural rhythm of expansion (liberty) and pruning (compassion), is
one that can lead to many possibilities.
I do not understand your analogies here. Could you elaborate?
(01-22-2018, 12:15 PM)elspru Wrote:Quote:One big difference I see between STS and STO in this regard, is that the STSTechnically STO people shouldn't be judging money either lol, that's not a very
mindset is conscious of its choice to manifest certain things. The STS
individual doesn't judge money as bad for example. This is an advantage in my
opinion.
compassionate thing to do.
Though I know I struggled for a long time with the idea of money,
I've only recently opened myself up to it as I've come to realize that I can't
accomplish my mission without it.
Anyone plugged into the media, and having been brainwashed since birth in this present-day society, likely has negative attitudes toward money. Even people who say they don't. It's ingrained. I recommend calling money, cabbage, so the emotional charge behind the word and all the brainwashing is bypassed.

It is possible to operate the same in either circumstance—affluent or broke. I just just see it as having disposable funds or not, while I do the same thing—build businesses and live my life to the fullest I can. The only difference is that when I am living minimally because of low funds, I have fewer choices, which is why I work to make more money so I have more choices.
Almost anyone who reads the above will have some sort of charge from what I say about making more money. Because what most people hear is, "make more money," rather than the point: create more choices. Someone may react with, But that's not really what matters in life, love is, or family, or, Money doesn't buy love, or, something about a Dicken's character named Scrooge.
(01-22-2018, 12:15 PM)elspru Wrote:Quote:The STS individual just goes after what he or she wants very directly.
And these things are supported within the current mass consciousness—in other
words, all people expect this behavior and they go along with it either by
choice or by the choice not to make a choice (victim).
So you would ascribe goal seeking as naturally affiliated with STS then?
Absolutely not. All I said was that the STS individual has an advantage here due to not judging the process.
(01-22-2018, 12:15 PM)elspru Wrote:Quote: The STO individual is more confused in my opinion. To use the above reference, the STO individual
often thinks money IS bad, that to be materialistic is not as good as being of
service. But this thinking is skewed and I think is being generated by the sway
of mass consciousness. This mass consciousness may or may not have been
generated by the STS individuals in power, but certainly is perpetuated by that
machine. So it behooves the STO individual to detach from human judgments,
unplug from mass consciousness and the media. It'll be easier to swim upstream
that way.
Curious, I was under the impression the mass consciousness and media were a
primarily an STO thing.
Not sure what you mean here. Mass consciousness is made up of the whole spectrum of individuals. Though "followers" would be less likely to be STS.
(01-22-2018, 12:15 PM)elspru Wrote: Showing images of suffering, are simply opportunities for sending of compassion,
and thus increasing STO polarization.
That may be one tiny part of the media machine. Surely you are aware of propaganda, newstainment, celebrity sychophantism, people anesthetized by TV. When I was in Bolivia, at the time the poorest country in the world, out in the middle of nowhere in shacks with no indoor bathrooms, there were TVs on. How they got them I don't know. But media brainwashing is ubiquitous.