Wow. Marriage comes up as an orange ray blockage

[jivatman]

there is a catch there. it says, controlled fascism, or the equally controlled social common ownership of all things. it does not equate these things to each other.

indeed, ra says they see too much order as something inherently negative. this reflects in their statement above - if, rules and regulations go over a certain extent in social common ownership of all things, it becomes too orderly, and in Ra's perspective, negative. because, they see too much order as negative in core.

this is recoupled with their statement stating that the rise of concept of ownership, over freely giving (along with other factors) had led to a decrease in the lifespan of the entities. therefore, coupled with other statements that paint ownership concept as something pertaining to orange ray possessive blockage, this makes the concept of ownership as something undesirable in positive path.

I agree with this, especially the point that too much order is negative.
I suppose what was unclear was I said they were equal, wheras Ra says they are equal in the degree of central control possible - a point made by classical liberals and anarchists.

not having a central control doesnt make something unorderly or disorganized, leave aside anarchic. federation means the grouping of more than one unit, and each unit may have their own internal format. these agree and function upon commonly accepted rules and formats as a federation. this may not interfere with the entities' internal formats and rules and laws, but, it doesnt change the fact that, for acting together, there needs to be various formats agreed upon. else, if it was anarchy, there wouldnt be any confederation, federation, or any need for a federation or confederation. there would be just anarchy.

I am referring to anarchism the political form. Examples of this are prewar Spain and depression era-America. Both experiments were extremely sucessful in the degree of freedom and prosperity they produced relative to neighbors, but where ultimately crushed by state powers who rightly viewed them as a serious challenge to their authority.

Anarchism is a free association of individuals without central control, a confederation is an association of governments without central control.

It is in this manner only that they are analogous.

and most ironically, this is one of the errors in the plan of this logos - monogamy is something that is inherently a trait of higher densities too, just like various other concepts. it actually is not suitable with 3d and its nature. you cant force something before its time.

Free will is paramount though.

If people are marrying because of societal pressure, I doubt they will express the higher aspects of it, and they may indeed be better off being promiscuity.

but monagamy is nevertheless useful for more advanced individuals who enter into it freely.