Wow. Marriage comes up as an orange ray blockage

[unity100]

I am referring to anarchism the political form. Examples of this are prewar Spain and depression era-America. Both experiments were extremely sucessful in the degree of freedom and prosperity they produced relative to neighbors, but where ultimately crushed by state powers who rightly viewed them as a serious challenge to their authority.

Anarchism is a free association of individuals without central control, a confederation is an association of governments without central control.

It is in this manner only that they are analogous.

i dont think taking examples from history, especially near history, would work for analyzing this. the cultural, economical and social situations in near history has been always mixed ones, and there has never been any kind of state at which one could examine the efficiency of different methods and systems in their pure form. add to this the detrimental effect of private interests.

depression era america was a situation of crashdown in a capitalist hierarchical economy. and what has only brought the situation around has been the programs of fdr. ironically, all countries got out of 20s depression in the same way - by implementing mass public projects.

if prewar spain, you mean civil war spain or the period earlier, i would say that no argument of freedom or prosperity could be made for that period. people were assassinating each other, destroying stuff, and there was general turmoil.

Anarchism is a free association of individuals without central control, a confederation is an association of governments without central control.

the governments would still have central control.

and a confederation, would act as its own controlling entity, with the participation of different governments, based on the agreed-on rules and principles.

so, there is still control even in confederation. the 'centralization' part is moot - the confederation may elect to set up a center to coordinate all this process, or, it may not. still, the confederation would act together, deciding on agreed-on principles.

Free will is paramount though.

If people are marrying because of societal pressure, I doubt they will express the higher aspects of it, and they may indeed be better off being promiscuity.

but monagamy is nevertheless useful for more advanced individuals who enter into it freely.

my approach was in more deeper levels.

monogamous conditions, apparently, arise from the increased purification of entities in higher densities. in these densities, entities' spirit manifests increasingly fully, putting forth their particular nature and preferences and vibrations specific to any entity. this, in turn, would make entities naturally prefer to be with entities which complement their nature. add to this the fact that as densities go forth, entities will become more refined and sensitive. so it makes long term matchups an inevitability.

but, in 3rd d, situation is not as such. entity is newly 3d, or late 3d, or in between. its preferences, biases coming from spirit, its spirit is not manifesting in a definitive manner. these distortions are not easily noticeable or usable by the entity. and, it can be said that it doesnt even matter much, for the entity, consciously or consciously, yet at that point.

so, matching with other entities becomes easy. then again, this is also the true nature of 3rd d - 'there are other entities than me' -> the entities are needing to be in multiples, in many, crowded societies, and interact with each other, therefore developing and refining their own biases and preferences.

what happens when you match up entities for prolonged durations ? you take out or reduce the 'interacting with other entities' part greatly -> therefore, reducing the experience that happens in 3rd d.

all things should happen in their due time. a preference cannot be forced or created or make come up to surface, before its time. if, monogamous situations are inherent to higher densities, that means they are inherent to higher densities. it is illogical to attempt carrying it to a lower density.

this is my angle.

actually there are more stuff in that parallel - the 'unity', 'oneness' concepts are THE meaning and emphasis of 6d, but, this logos has emphasized that in all its creation over anything else (oneness) and then, apparently, attempted to carry it over to 3d.

this is way over the head of 3d entities. even if they understood it, there is no way they can actually manifest that understanding, because it requires 6d energies. and 6d energies in 3d, is a concept way off. so, the entity understands and accepts the concept and maybe even manifests a measure of understanding by trace amounts of 6d energy manifested in pyramids, temples, meditation, this that, but, when going out to daily world, easily forgets, ignores, suspends those understandings. because the energies to manifest them are not found out there, and it cant work. this may be what's underlying the issue Ra describes by saying entities were accepting the concepts they were given in training, but, ignoring them when they return to their daily lives.