I think 'purity' is a matter of compatibility and not much more. I have often wondered at this idea and claim of 'purity' of sources. It seems to me that it really just seems to represent a manner in which the individual themselves feels reflected in what they are reading. To me, it just means that the source is what it says it is. I'm not sure I entirely believe the claims made in the material as to its source.
I, personally, don't find it all that more concise than other cosmological systems (and it strongly resembles Theosophical cosmology to me), largely because I feel it leaves so many questions unasked and unanswered. Rather, being one more description of 'that which is' I think it is most useful as a reflective surface, as I think of all philosophical systems.
The 'light' of the Ra Material is certainly very bright and intense even, but for myself it isn't the 'clearest' energy I have experienced. It more draws by its luminosity, intense white light.
I, personally, don't find it all that more concise than other cosmological systems (and it strongly resembles Theosophical cosmology to me), largely because I feel it leaves so many questions unasked and unanswered. Rather, being one more description of 'that which is' I think it is most useful as a reflective surface, as I think of all philosophical systems.
The 'light' of the Ra Material is certainly very bright and intense even, but for myself it isn't the 'clearest' energy I have experienced. It more draws by its luminosity, intense white light.