Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density"

    Thread: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density"


    Ree33 (Offline)

    Newbie
    Posts: 9
    Threads: 2
    Joined: Jun 2018
    #1
    06-18-2018, 12:16 PM (This post was last modified: 06-18-2018, 12:18 PM by Ree33.)
    Hello,

    I'm very new to the Law of One, so this is a beginner type of question...

    I don't quite understand the language of "density" versus "dimension."  They appear to have been used interchangeably in several places while other times it appears they mean different things.  

    Below are some text which I found confusing with regard to density/dimension terminology:

    6.18 Questioner: After this thirty-year period I am assuming we will be a fourth-dimension or fourth-density planet. Is this correct?
    Ra: I am Ra. This is so.
    this indicates the two are the same?

    6.8 Questioner: Where is this Council located?
    Ra: This Council is located in the octave, or eight[h] dimension, of the planet Saturn, taking its place in an area which you understand in third-dimensional terms as the rings.
    This indicates the two are different terms as substituting "dimension" with "density" does not appear to make sense...

    6.16 Questioner: What is the position of this planet with respect to progression of the cycle at this time?
    Ra: I am Ra. This sphere is at this time in fourth-dimension vibration. Its material is quite confused due to the society memory complexes embedded in its consciousness. It has not made an easy transition to the vibrations which beckon. Therefore, it will be fetched with some inconvenience.
    Ra says the Earth is a 3rd density planet, but it in its 4th dimension vibration?  Is this the 4 known dimensions of space (3D) and time?

    6.13 Q U E S T I O N E R Thanks. Is all of the earth’s population then—human population of the earth—are all of them originally from Maldek?
    R A I am Ra. This is a new line of questioning and deserves a place of its own. The ones who were harvested to your sphere from the sphere known before its dissolution as other names, but to your peoples as Maldek, incarnated, many within your earth’s surface rather than upon it. The population of your planet contains many various groups harvested from other second-dimension and cycled third-dimension spheres. You are not all one race or background of beginning. The experience you share is unique to this time/space continuum.
    In the above, Ra talks about 2D and 3D spheres... which could interchangeably be 2nd density and 3rd density spheres?

    10.3 QUESTIONER And have any of the Maldek entities transformed now? Are they now still second-density, or are they forming some third-density planet now?
    R A The consciousness of these entities has always been third-density. The alleviation mechanism was designed by the placement of this consciousness in second-dimensional physical chemical complexes which are not able to be dexterous or manipulative to the extent which is appropriate to the workings of the third-density distortions of the mind complex.
    This text is also a source of confusion as the Maldek entities, as I understand them, are 3rd density with regard to consciousness, but inhabiting 2nd density physical bodies. By this understanding, this quote would suggest "dimension" and "density" are interchangeable.

    I appreciate any clarity on the subject!!!  Smile

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by Ree33 - 06-18-2018, 12:16 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by unity100 - 06-18-2018, 02:04 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by Ree33 - 06-18-2018, 02:30 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by Jim Kent + - 06-18-2018, 02:55 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by unity100 - 06-18-2018, 04:53 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by Infinite - 06-18-2018, 08:32 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by JJCarsonian - 06-18-2018, 08:37 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by JJCarsonian - 06-18-2018, 08:45 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by AnthroHeart - 06-18-2018, 09:28 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by JJCarsonian - 06-18-2018, 09:37 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by Foha - 06-18-2018, 11:47 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by JJCarsonian - 06-19-2018, 11:31 AM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by Learner - 06-19-2018, 11:32 AM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by moyal - 06-19-2018, 06:44 PM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by Ree33 - 06-20-2018, 08:23 AM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by Jim Kent + - 06-20-2018, 11:02 AM
    RE: Beginner Q: "Dimension" v "Density" - by Ree33 - 06-24-2018, 12:45 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode