Could science finally be catching up to the Law of One?

[Glow]

I told my atheist friend. He might come back with a retort. So I don't know.
He seems to get angry when I point this out, but he also points out Law of One debunking stuff to me.

It does say at the end that the views of author aren't necessarily the views of Scientific American.
But they had to approve it I'm sure.

It didn't emphatically say that we are definitely one. It just said it would be good to have a oneness mindset.

And what does it even mean that everything is one? I've heard that and read that.
I know it means we all share one mind. That what you do to one affects everything.
What does it really mean that all is connected?

How would you describe these to an atheist skeptic?

Do you remember when Ra pointes out that from their vantage we all looked literally like 1.

If you have an energy ball with different shades of light but the same source. Is each different shade emitted separate or still of the 1 light.
Everything is energy.

It’s both depending on perspective and that really is all that separates us.
We are 1, we can see and live and explore as many but we are 1 from one source always united just veiled.

I don’t know if you need to debate these things with people, either they want to see or they don’t. There are a lot of great atheist living sto paths.
I’m not sure it matters that they consciously understand.
Law of confusion.