12-21-2010, 08:24 AM
(12-21-2010, 07:54 AM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: The term would be sounds theoretical, as in, it would be if it happened. But the last statement is very conclusive that it didn't happen, at least not in this instance. No mention is made of other instances.
if the below
Quote:This would be the loss to the Creator of part of the Creator and thus we were given permission, not to stop the events, but to ensure the survival of the, shall we say, disembodied mind/body/spirit complex. This we did in those events which you mention, losing no spirit or portion or holograph or microcosm of the macrocosmic Infinite One."
didnt happen, the below
Quote:Those who were destroyed, not by radiation, but by the trauma of the energy release, found not only the body/mind/spirit complex made unviable, but also a disarrangement of that unique vibratory complex you have called the spirit complex, which we understand as a mind/body/spirit complex, to be completely disarranged without possibility of re-integration.
would happen.
that was prevented, by the block you placed last, and i placed second.
no, it didnt happen, in nagasaki and hiroshima. but, it would happen if not intervenened. meaning :
Quote:This we did in those events which you mention, losing no spirit or portion or holograph or microcosm of the macrocosmic Infinite One
the 'this we did in those events which you mention' part is curious.
ra doesnt say 'this is how it is done' or 'confederation prevents such loss of souls'. instead, they specifically mention 'this we did in those events which you mention'.
.............
i wasnt saying that souls were lost in nagasaki and hiroshima. i was saying that, the possibility for a soul being destroyed existed, according to what we quoted regarding those two events.
the reason why no souls were lost in those events, was because an intervention was made.
we dont know whether interventions were made in the case of maldek, mars, atlantis and the eradication of north africa/middle east.