(12-23-2010, 05:58 PM)Nabil Naser Wrote: Many years ago, I received an advice from someone special. The advice was to avoid trying to share information with those who Do Not, or Can Not, understand what I have to share.
I do not think that there is anything else I can do to explain the material any better for you, Unity100.
You have shown that you do not see any value in it. That's just fine. Please ignore it all together. I am certain that you can use your time more efficiently by concentrating on subjects that you find more meaningful.
youre just not willing to prove your proposition.
you have proposed that there were secrets in this, and you have shown various religious text as example, straying off to numerology.
we have questioned you whether it held universally as you have suggested, for other religious text, however at that point you are dodging with excuses of us being unreceptive, we not seeing any value in it, not wanting to accept it and so on.
of course i dont want to accept it. there is nothing to accept so far, because you, the proposer of the information have not followed on your task to put forth what you are apparently sharing on solid ground.
you are saying you are bringing some kind of deep information, however, you are unwilling to prove that it tests on the grounds you yourself have proposed.
burden of proof and explanation lies on you, because you are the one who brought this in front of other people. for the good or bad, for better or worse, you have came in front of us with this information, advocating it to us.
we are not obliged to be receptive, and take whatever you are saying, and then go about researching it on our own, just because you have presented something in front of us. it needs to be proven valid, at least on the grounds you are proposing, before anyone can even be receptive.
notice, i didnt even say 'on any ground'. you need to prove it on the ground you are standing. noone has to take it seriously, unless the ground you are basing your proposition on doesnt hold.
you are saying that there are deep meanings, and probably a master plan in the choice of words and numbers in english language bible, and genesis, and word god and whatnot, you are ALSO saying that this probably works for any other language bible/word god, yet, when asked to make it work and prove them, you are straying onto arguments like 'you are unreceptive'.
no, neither me, nor anyone else are unreceptive. just you are throwing off some proposition and wanting to accept it without being proven.
if you want your information to be taken seriously, prove it on the grounds you have proposed, before expecting anything from us.
if your proposition/logic doesnt even get validated on the grounds you are proposing, then it means that that proposition/logic cannot be taken seriously.