Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers

[redchartreuse]

I have this wild theory that Linda Sarsour may be one of those entities of which Ra spoke. She seems to be repeating the same lessons here on Gaia regarding holy wars and knowing what's best for another entity.

To be honest, I had no clue who that was before you mentioned her.  I looked her up on Wikipedia, and she appears to be a fairly run-of-the-mill activist.  While I admit social activism tends to leave a bad taste in my mouth- being for the most part seemingly devoid of any type of wisdom which would recognize that such forceful activity towards any one outcome simply tends to energize its opposite- I did not see anything in particular that would lead me to understand why you would single her out over any other self-absorbed activist type.

Care to expand?

I guess sometimes the will of the higher self and the will of the incarnate self can appear to be at odds. However, I submit that this is most likely an illusion, and the less distorted will of the Higher Self takes precedence over the desires of the lower incarnate self. I'd imagine that through meditation, inspiration, etc., the incarnated self may penetrate the Veil and discover its true desires. It's always a learning process used by the higher self to create growth and apprehension of lessons.

I would tend to agree, and often find myself falling back upon the idea that the purpose behind incarnation is to grow and evolve.  So even if we cannot penetrate the veil sufficiently enough to know the purposes of another's soul or Higher Self, we can reasonably assume that growth is indeed the objective.

As Ra says, "To a mind/body/spirit complex which is starving, the appropriate response is the feeding of the body."  To me, those who are languishing in neutrality are spiritually starving, and for me to simply walk on by "wishing them well" seems incredibly cold and heartless from a higher perspective.

And sure... one might consider it crude- or even cruel- to attempt to "zen slap" another self into a moment of wakefulness, but what really is the alternative?  For these other-selves which we have but momentary acquaintance with... there is no time to develop an close, intimate relationship founded upon love and understanding, with which we could leverage in order to gently awaken them.

And even if we attempted to tell these people that we love and care about them... surely they would distrust us even more, and feel that we were trying to manipulate and "get something out of" them.  

Again, I think it's a function of the Veil which produces growth and learning.

Yes, but to a point.  Too much veil, and the learning goes down the tubes.  vis a vis Earth circa 2019.

There was a preincarnate plan for those two, made by their higher selves and containing multiple possible paths/timelines. The Higher Self seems to be indifferent as to which path is taken (the outcome), as long as the lessons are learned and the growth occurs. Polarization is a strictly mechanical process which can be scientifically measured. So it seems that these two entities were not able to penetrate the Veil sufficiently in order to align their will with their Higher Selves. However, the growth and learning occurred.

You appear to have just confirmed my previous point.  If the veil is so thick that it cannot be sufficiently penetrated, even by those hailing from higher densities, then it has failed its purpose.  The veil is supposed to give us some resistance, not to make our task utterly impossible.

And now we see Linda Sarsour once again choosing the most difficult path of learning. I feel like she's gonna be pretty surprised once she gets on the other side of the Veil, to see that she is repeating the same holy wars catalyst and making the exact same mistakes/distortions as she incarnated here to balance. I wonder if I'm correct, and if so, who the other person is, and if they are incarnate.

I am once again failing to see the source of your strong bias against this individual.  Does she not have a place to voice her opinions, as misguided as they may be? And do you feel she has any actual level of power or influence greater than any other of the countless activists each trying to forward their own pet agendas at this time?  At least to my perception, the efforts of most activists amount to nil due to a seeming unwillingness or inability to accept the validity of any opposing viewpoint.  They can be annoying, to be sure, but in the end, typically entirely ineffectual.

This individual just simply does not appear to be in possession of any real power to me.  Why are they perceived as such a threat to you?

In any case, you may have missed where Ra said, "These entities joined Ra in fourth-density positive for a portion of the cycle which we experienced."  and so I'm pretty sure she is not one of those entities.