Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers

    Thread: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers


    redchartreuse Away

    Account Closed
    Posts: 153
    Threads: 18
    Joined: Nov 2018
    #41
    03-12-2019, 04:06 PM (This post was last modified: 03-12-2019, 04:12 PM by redchartreuse.)
    (03-12-2019, 02:44 PM)Minyatur Wrote: I don't feel jugment for you and instead attempt to point out the paradox I see in your queries.

    Yes, this exactly!  Which is why I put it in quotes.  You are attempting to point out the paradox you see in my queries.  I assuming you wish to do this for my benefit, and to help move me closer to my previously stated goal of understanding.  Yes?

    100% is what I am talking about.  You see- in reality- no matter how it may "appear" to be according to my subjective opinion- at the end of the day it is *I* who would be judging you to be "judgmental" when all you did was point out a paradox.

    If I now went off about how dare you judge me- and this and that- what would that REALLY say about me?  And what would that REALLY say about you?

    Or how about if I go off on a full-blown analysis of telling YOU how YOU FEEL, and claiming that your words carried malice toward me, even if you did not actually wish me ill?

    Everybody knows the answer to this.  Oh sure, they may sit there on the sidelines watching silently out of fear, or "politeness" or concern for putting their polarity at risk.

    But we all would know, wouldn't we?  The only reason I would accuse YOU of being "judgmental" for pointing out a paradox you see in ME is because... deep down I know that you are right.  But for me to admit that would mean I have to give up... something... some benefit I am getting from this.

    Do you see?  "Pointing out a paradox" is no different from what I called a "zen slap."  It really isn't.  Maybe... slap was poor choice of words as people have apparently had very large emotional reactions to it.

    But we are all adults here, right?  I think we are all capable of speaking to the point, and looking past the surface of communication style.  Yes?

    Quote:everyone awakening and changing and in that you would find to be well.

    No.  That is not it, which I have mentioned previously.  This is coming from somewhere else, either your own internal bias or repeating what you seen in others.

    I don't require "everyone" to awaken and "change."  

    Firstly, I am not asking anybody to "change".  I am inviting them to take up the path of growth they have previously chosen, and this is what I am calling "awakening." It is awakening to one's spiritual purpose, which at the bare minimum, is growth and evolution.  It doesn't mean I have any idea what that is.  Or how they should go about it.

    I don't even know if any given moment is the "right time"  all I know is I am there/then in THAT moment when an opportunity arises.

    Secondly, the goal isn't everybody.  It is one person at a time.

    I never said everybody.  And I never said I expected it to work all the time, in fact, I said it doesn't work most of the time.  

    But sometimes it makes a difference... to that one.  And then they thank me.

    This is what I said, but few appear to be responding to that...?

    Quote:Acceptance is not something that will make me think more or less highly of you, it is something that liberates you from non-acceptance, which is a state of disharmony that is a dead end in itself.

    Acceptance is not a two-dimensional concept.  It is not either/or.  Acceptance can occur at some levels, and not at other levels.  At certain times, and not at other times.  It is not so cut and dried.

    Quote:Let's say that the energy in your words can water another' soul, do you want to offer remarks energized with frustration or something a tad more clean? Not that frustration can't make a good catalyst, just that it also needs to be recognized as originating from the self.

    I see where you are going, though I must tell you that I tend to think of this in terms of effective or not effective.  Remarks are as they are, with all the appurtenant emotional tinges incumbent upon me being in human form.  I do not claim to have achieved such a level of emotional Mastery so as to be able to veil my feelings, nor would I consider it to be very wise to do so.

    Veiled feelings... this is a big reason why people sleep, I think.  They don't believe themselves capable of bearing the truth of how other human beings truly feel toward them.

    You know... the ones who couldn't care less about their well-being unless it earns them an extra buck.  Or the ones actually consciously acting to make them into willing slaves.

    No, we are too busy becoming outraged at others who are "judging us" for behaving outrageously.    If only those a******* would just come to "love and accept us as we are" then we could really get this "love and peace" show on the road!  BigSmile

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 02:51 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by ada - 03-06-2019, 03:08 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 04:17 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by ada - 03-06-2019, 04:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-06-2019, 03:44 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 04:19 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-06-2019, 04:50 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Aaron - 03-06-2019, 08:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 09:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Infinite Unity - 03-06-2019, 11:23 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 11:41 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Infinite Unity - 03-10-2019, 08:18 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 12:13 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-07-2019, 12:39 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 01:15 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-07-2019, 01:58 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Tae - 03-09-2019, 11:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 11:37 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-10-2019, 12:10 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-10-2019, 12:21 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 01:59 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-07-2019, 12:50 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by unity100 - 03-08-2019, 07:01 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by einmal - 04-11-2019, 12:54 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-08-2019, 09:03 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-09-2019, 02:44 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 10:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-09-2019, 07:38 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 11:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-10-2019, 09:54 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-10-2019, 03:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-10-2019, 05:20 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 11:28 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 12:30 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-12-2019, 08:05 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 10:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Tae - 03-12-2019, 05:57 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 11:27 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-13-2019, 01:07 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 11:38 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 12:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 12:53 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 02:44 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 04:06 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 08:27 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Diana - 03-20-2019, 11:45 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-20-2019, 10:03 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-21-2019, 09:20 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 11:13 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-21-2019, 11:25 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 12:17 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-22-2019, 10:17 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Diana - 03-21-2019, 10:59 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 12:10 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-12-2019, 12:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 02:06 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-12-2019, 06:51 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-13-2019, 03:27 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-13-2019, 09:11 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-13-2019, 11:00 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by kristina - 03-13-2019, 10:24 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-13-2019, 01:21 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-13-2019, 03:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 12:15 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 12:32 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 01:20 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 05:49 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 07:01 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 07:46 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 08:22 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-14-2019, 09:29 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 10:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-15-2019, 12:17 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 03:34 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-17-2019, 11:05 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 08:18 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-20-2019, 11:00 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 08:24 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-15-2019, 12:08 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-15-2019, 11:43 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 12:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 09:12 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-15-2019, 06:30 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 06:55 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 08:34 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 09:12 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 10:20 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 06:30 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-16-2019, 01:28 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-17-2019, 01:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 07:57 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-17-2019, 08:56 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 09:09 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-17-2019, 08:19 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-21-2019, 11:09 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cyan - 03-21-2019, 12:22 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-22-2019, 11:37 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-22-2019, 01:10 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by unity100 - 04-11-2019, 02:00 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 04-11-2019, 03:47 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 04-11-2019, 04:21 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by einmal - 04-11-2019, 04:39 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode