03-13-2019, 10:24 AM
(03-06-2019, 02:51 PM)redchartreuse Wrote: In this session, Ra refers to the two wanderers who unintentionally negatively polarized and self-harvested to 4D negative during their second cycle.
To be fully honest and transparent here, I have to say that I can somewhat empathize with their attitude toward those neutral beings. Though I can not see myself using the "domination unto physical death" as a means of promoting growth and evolution in other-selves, I have been known to use the very sharply pointed words as sort of a "zen slap" in order to shock a person momentarily into a higher state of awareness, in hopes that this may catalyze them into seeking.
Though, for the most part, this does not work and the other-self quickly returns to their slumber... occasionally it does work, with the result of people approaching me at a later time, sometimes after many years, and thanking me for my pointed remarks. Having lodged themselves into their consciousness, it seems at times to have prevented them from fully returning to an unconscious state.
Whereas the alternative proposed by Ra, to "offer those comforts designed for the sleeping" or to idly "send them love and light and wish them well", quite frankly, seem overly lazy and complacent to me, even to the point of bordering on condescension. Again, just trying to share my honest perspective here.
In any case, this leads me to two questions regarding how this may all affect one's polarity.
The first has to do with the free-will of the other-self. As Ra has unequivocally stated, the purpose of taking incarnation is to spiritually evolve. And so, while the incarnated self may have not "asked" for the service, the larger portion of themselves, indeed, has the intention of evolving. And if their connection to their own soul is too blocked or ignored as to make any difference, than what other option do we have than to try to awaken them from within the 3D environment?
In other words- when considering the possible infringement upon free-will are we to only consider that which has been requested by the small incarnated self, or does the will of the larger being outside of the space/time incarnation take precedence?
Secondly- Ra says here that these two beings polarized negatively despite having created results contrary to their intentions. So which is it that holds sway in determining the polarization? Intentions or outcomes? Because Q'uo often suggests that it is only the intention that counts, and not the outcome... so their teachings appear to be at odds here.
The way I see it....
Who are you to take their experience away from them according to their own choosing? What right does another have to lovingly slap you from your slumber? Do you know their true timeline in which they choose to awaken? No. No more than they may know yours.
If you are sleeping and someone rudely awakens you and they are persistant that you awaken yet you do not want to. What right do they have to stand at your bedside and harp until you begrudgingly awaken? Though they may make it in time to work, the experience they had with you was distasteful and disruptive. Why not use love instead? The harm in administering love is what? There is a deeper learning of yourself and of the rights of others to choose their own way. You could simply "accept" they want to sleep, cover their feet and give them the comfort they desire; which is love. Anything outside of that complete acceptance of their personal desires is the opposite of love. And it literally goes straight into an area of controlling another.